Talk:Ironic process theory

I never thought Wikipedia would make me lose The Game. 68.40.58.27 (talk) 01:13, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dohohohohohoho ~九尾の氷狐~ ^{(「Sumimasen!」「Dochira samaka?」)} 10:16, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Funny - it makes me lose all the time. The concept "people bickering about whether a wikipedia article should be deleted or not" reminds me of the ur-example: has any article ever had its status changed more than the article about the game? --Adam Field (talk) 21:48, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup

The whole article is confusing. The first paragraph makes no sense - perhaps a diagram can help? The first sentence in the second paragraph references "this"??? RainBoxRed (talk) 14:28, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Remove The Game

I'm proposing to remove the photo reference to "The Game." 'The Game' is a separate topic from the psychological phenomenon of "ironic process theory". Including as a primary photo reference, a picture depicting The Game in this particular article is not relevant, nor apropos. (As an illustration, you wouldn't expect to see a photo of the game "Monopoly" in an article on "real estate"; the two are separate topics. I am fine with including a reference to 'The Game' as already included in this article. So, if no one disputes this proposal, I'll remove the photo. Thank you.Ronsword (talk) 19:43, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]