Talk:Atkinson–Shiffrin memory model

This article is currently the subject of an educational assignment.

Psychology Start‑class High‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

I have removed the 'wikify' tag as I cannot see how this article does not fit the Manual of Style. Stonemaccas Sep 19th 2006

Reasoning for Grading

Hello there folks, i recently added the Rating of this article, and i gave it the quality of a start-class article. It's going towards a B at the moment, but needs to be referenced and well wikified/verified in some areas. Let's aim to quote and reference well, and get this to a Featured article.

This is also an important topic, as whilst the majority of it's assumptions were somewhat lacking with biological and neurological evidence, it's still a very important topic in psychology as it heralded much further research into memory and helped develop some other memory models also. That's all for now :-) Your mission, should you choose to accept it is to FA this article's ass off! James S 16:14, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Clive Wearing

Is the Clive Wearing mentioned in the article this Clive Wearing? Traumrune (talk) 17:13, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Review

I felt the article lacked sufficient examples and research. There were a lot of citations missing from this article. You should try to find solid examples and research that support your idea. I also feel that, when I finished reading your article, I was still not completely informed on the topic. There is still quite a bit of room for elaboration and references. Also, charts and graphics would have been helpful for understanding. I feel elaborating on the things not as well-known about memory would have been more helpful, i.e., Monolithicity, for example. Lastly, the comments from other users feature questionable language, which is unprofessional in my opinion. Bro47024 (talk) 05:29, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]