Welcome to the computing section
of the Wikipedia reference desk.

Select a section:

WP:RD/C

Want a faster answer?

Main page: Help searching Wikipedia

How can I get my question answered?

Select the section of the desk that best fits the general topic of your question (see the navigation column to the right).
Post your question to only one section, providing a short header that gives the topic of your question.
Type '~~~~' (that is, four tilde characters) at the end – this signs and dates your contribution so we know who wrote what and when.
Don't post personal contact information – it will be removed. Any answers will be provided here.
Please be as specific as possible, and include all relevant context – the usefulness of answers may depend on the context.
Note:
- We don't answer (and may remove) questions that require medical diagnosis or legal advice.
- We don't answer requests for opinions, predictions or debate.
- We don't do your homework for you, though we'll help you past the stuck point.
- We don't conduct original research or provide a free source of ideas, but we'll help you find information you need.

Ready? Ask a new question!

How do I answer a question?

Main page: Wikipedia:Reference desk/Guidelines

The best answers address the question directly, and back up facts with wikilinks and links to sources. Do not edit others' comments and do not give any medical or legal advice.

August 28

Options request by firefox.

Currently this is giving me problems, when I try submit stuff, (From an usefull userscript for a page), these servers are 'silly' and can't reply correctly to an OPTIONS request, I don't have any control over the servers, but I really want to fix this problem...

Is there anyway.. to disable options request, or to enable Cross-Domain Ajax just for one domain in firefox? , or at least allow cross domain request globally? Thanks.. 190.158.212.204 (talk) 00:19, 28 August 2012 (UTC) Also.. is there any way to add user quota in a page from google chrome? It can be user side fix. I'm getting QUOTA_EXCEEDED_ERR: DOM Exception 22. 190.158.212.204 (talk) 00:35, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Is a GPU Required in a Computer?

When a computer displays a graphic on the screen, does it have to use a GPU? Can the CPU communicate directly with a monitor? I am aware some modern CPUs have GPU circuitry built in, but for the sake of simplicity, please assume I am referring to CPUs manufactured before 2010. If they always use the GPU, how much do they rely on it for simple tasks like composing e-mails and browsing web sites? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.95.200.141 (talk) 05:16, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

At the very least, you need a PHY that operates a standard display protocol - like VGA or HDMI. Usually, there's a little hardware to control the PHY, and a video frame buffer. Without that hardware, you can't get a signal to a monitor. One could call that hardware a GPU, but in modern terminology, a GPU also usually supports certain specific mathematical operations: "T&L", often providing hardware support to a standard API like OpenGL. Those features are't required to put pixels on a screen; but this hardware is so commonplace that modern operating systems make use of it even during normal use, like displaying windows, editing text, and browsing the web. Nimur (talk) 05:32, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Transform & lighting was a fairly late addition to consumer GPUs, which is why it was advertised more prominently as something they support—the rest was taken for granted. The earliest GPUs just did bulk pixel-moving operations (blitting) faster than the CPU could (although they were called blitters then, not GPUs). The first 3D GPUs rendered shaded polygons but didn't work out the vertex locations or colors (that's the transform and lighting part). As long as the polygon count was small T&L could be done on the CPU, since it's per-vertex rather than per-pixel. -- BenRG (talk) 17:38, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reply. So, I assume, then, that disabling the GPU on most modern systems would render the monitor nonoperational, because the PHY chip and the framebuffer are build into the GPU? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.95.200.141 (talk) 06:41, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That's usually where the functionality is built in to. Of course, it can be elsewhere: on the CPU, or on the CPU's chipset or main logic board controller; there may be more than one unit, digitally switched to drive one or more connector sockets. On many PCs, the main GPU is started late in the boot, so the very first signals you see on power-up are sourced by the simple built-in graphics system; once the necessary software has loaded, the operating system initializes the main GPU and switches the display signal to source from there. On embedded computers, or custom-designed systems, almost anything is possible. Nimur (talk) 15:55, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A computer can well do without graphics circuitry of its own, it can have, say, a serial terminal attached to it. Early computers worked this way which I think is responsible for the rise of editors like vi, as you can't easily draw windows, menus and stuff over a 300 baud line. Уга-уга12 (talk) 11:49, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Going back to earlier personal computers, the Apple II, for example, did not have a dedicated GPU. Tarcil (talk) 17:29, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Apple II had an analog RF modulator that output NTSC signal. It is usually called a "video controller unit" or a "modulator," not a "graphics processor." It was, as I mentioned above, just a PHY, and did not include hardware to accelerate mathematical operations like matrix transforms for 3D projection or texture scaling. Apple II did include a hardware and ROM-supported text mode. Nimur (talk) 18:13, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

My understanding of the term "GPU" has always been that it's a specialized processor that writes to the frame buffer, and has nothing to do with the circuitry that reads the frame buffer and sends that data to the monitor. The GPU article seems to agree. So the answer is simply no. Even on a modern graphics card the GPU doesn't communicate with the monitor. You could remove the GPU from a modern card and still use it, if the drivers and the card wiring supported that.

The part that reads the frame buffer is called a RAMDAC, though I guess that term isn't appropriate any more when the output is digital (DVI/DisplayPort/HDMI). -- BenRG (talk) 17:12, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In the case of digital signaling, like HDMI and DVI, the more generic term, "PHY", is used. A RAMDAC is an implementation of a specific type of PHY for analog protocols (often VGA). Nimur (talk) 18:38, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've never heard "PHY" used in this way and googling [ramdac "phy"] doesn't turn up anything. I don't think it makes sense as a name, either, since the video output circuitry does a lot more than just send bytes over the wire, including colorspace conversion, hardware overlays and hardware cursors, and character generation. I'm not sure that all of this is covered by RAMDAC either, though.

Actually, according to the framebuffer article, "framebuffer" is a collective term for all of this circuitry. I'd always thought of it as just the VRAM. -- BenRG (talk) 20:54, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Terminology isn't nearly as standardized for engineering subsystems as it is for consumer-facing end-products. So, when you go down to a retail electronics store and buy a "graphics card," it's pretty clear that you mean "a GPU that supports (commonly-used graphics programming API A, B, and C version X); a connector-socket or sockets that connects to (recent modern video display standard D, E, and F version Y);" and so on. When you're looking across different types of computers, or across many generations spanning decades of engineering, the terminology is a lot less interchangeable. I used to work on at a silicon company that built a small camera processor (you might call it a "Digital Signal Processor"). For some customers, who wanted fancy animated graphical user-interfaces on their cameras, we used the camera's input pixel pipeline hardware to implement polygon rendering, and we used the DMAs to blit and scale and interpolate. By short-circuiting the hardware input from the sensor interface, we could even plug "textures" through the pipe. So, our chip and our operating system supported (some) 3D graphics, and a lot of 2D graphics operations. Nobody called it a "GPU" - we called it awful. And our "framebuffer" was just regular RAM; and our PHY was called "VOPU" for "video output unit." Almost nobody knew or used these acronyms, because we never marketed them. Anyway, my point is, there are "GPU"s - standard chips from NVIDIA and ATI and Matrox and Intel that support commonly-understood interfaces; and then there are "GPUs" - anything that resembles a "unit" that sort of "processes" "graphics." You can build any computer you want - with any kind of graphics processing capability - if you can resource the engineering talent and money to fab silicon. Otherwise, you have to take the feature-set that's available on the open market. Nimur (talk) 16:36, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The component that sends the data to the monitor is the TMDS transmitter (for DVI connections). A RAMDAC is used for VGA output. The GPU is used as a graphics accelerator and is used by the CPU to offload some of the graphics-processing burden. The CPU can manipulate graphics, but is less efficient at doing so. Today, both the RAMDAC and TMDS transmitter are usually integrated onto the same die as the GPU. But many card manufacturers add on a standalone TMDS transmitter to the card to support dual DVI outputs.—Best Dog Ever (talk) 05:39, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I read a tutorial once how to bit bang a tv signal using nothing but a single hi/lo pin on a microcontroller. It was certainly a demistifying experience. [here is such a tutorial] I think you'll find interesting. Vespine (talk) 23:56, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Play Ogg Theora and Vorbis files directly on iPad

Is there any app or extension which can play OGG files directly (without conversion) on iPad. Write English in Cyrillic (talk) 06:03, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You can use VLC on a jailbroken iPad, but it is no longer available from the Apple App Store. -- Finlay McWalterჷTalk 11:23, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DNS not working, but only for browsers

I have a laptop running Windows 7 x64 which had some kind of Internet monitoring/filtering software on it called "Action Alert". I noticed that this software was chewing up a lot of CPU, so I uninstalled it via the "Uninstall Action Alert" in the Windows Start Menu. Immediately after this, I noticed that all of the web browsers on the laptop (IE, Firefox and Chrome) are unable to resolve any host names. I tried googling the issues and found this forum post, which describes exactly the same problem I am having, and provides additional technical details. To the best of my ability I ran the same tests as mentioned in that post, and confirmed that Ping still works, and typing an IP address directly in the address bar also works. Other computers on the network have no problems, so I know it's not a general network issue. I am not using any proxies, either. I have never modified Windows Firewall, so it is set to whatever default settings it came with.

What can I do to get the browsers working again? 98.103.60.35 (talk) 12:50, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I would also check that nslookup www.google.com works. Have you checked your HOSTS file? Also it's possible the firewall has been set to prevent HTTP traffic - have you checked that?--Phil Holmes (talk) 15:00, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for a lame suggestion, but I would run a malware detector, on the theory that "Action Alert" is a redirector of some sort that has installed something that petulantly blocks browser requests that don't go through "Action Alert". Tarcil (talk) 17:21, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Googling vs. typing URLs

Is there any data on how often people Google the keywords they're looking for vs. entering a URL in their browser with the hope that it's what they are looking for? I'm thinking along the lines of someone looking for the Transformers movie — they could Google "transformers", where the movie (or its sequel) is the third GHit; or they could type "transformers.com" as a try at the URL, and end up at Hasbro's Transformers toy page. (PS: I found this link by googling, but it's got no actual data, just opinions.) Tarcil (talk) 17:14, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I will say that using a search engine is more likely to get you what you want. Anyone could have registered transformers.com. ¦ Reisio (talk) 17:46, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I would say the opposite; I know the exact URLs of almost all the websites that I care to read, and I usually navigate directly to them, rather than searching for them. Anyone could rank highly in a web-search for a keyword - purely at the discretion of the search-engine operator - and the result can change minute by minute; but DNS has a little bit more persistence and requires a formal registration. Certain domains, like .gov, .mil, and .edu, require "sufficient" paperwork to establish identity, while a web-search result simply satisfies the output-criteria of a proprietary, unpublished search-engine algorithm.

It will be almost impossible to collect data "in the wild," because unless you install spyware on a system, or snoop its network traffic, you can't know which URLs it visits. Commercially-sponsored, well-controlled studies have probably been performed to collect such data, but it's unlikely that data is available for free. You might find Mozilla Pancake useful as a start. Here are their user experience data - which looks pretty sparse. And, here's a paper called Effective Browsing and Serendipitous Discovery with an Experience-Infused Browser (PDF) from Stanford's Human-Computer Interaction group. (And, I discovered all of these links without using a search-engine of any kind - by directly typing in the URL of a reliable source, and browsing). Nimur (talk) 18:30, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

And you'd be wrong. Even if you already know the URI, people make typos. I prefer typing them out myself as well, but using a search engine is going to be more reliable for most people most of the time. ¦ Reisio (talk) 17:47, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm wrong about many things, but I'm curious: which thing am I wrong about in this case? It's not clear, from your comment. Nimur (talk) 16:43, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Considering the OP's link is from four years ago and there haven't been too many major changes to how we use browsers, I think there are still people typing URLs. Certainly, that is what I do if I am pretty sure about the URL - typing "www.<companyname>.<tld>" usually gets me the site I want and if not, then I have to search. My reasoning is that there are so many other sites out there offering opinion, comments, or just a page of links to similar sites that I am not interested in, or worse still offering me a US site of the same company. So for example, if I'm looking for the French language site of a famous swedish furniture store, ikea.fr gets me straight there, while googling offers me ikea.com and links to their US, UK, Canada, Australia and Singapore sites. Anyway, you asked for some data: How about this forum in which the third post says "... read some stats recently that 70% of Internet users type URLs into search bars..." then adds "...the lack of an address bar in Chrome is meant to steer more people back to Google for searches." Unfortunately he doesn't provide a source. Or there's this page about people typing URLs. A search reveals more discussion on this topic, but a quick skim through found no proper data; just discussions. Astronaut (talk) 19:20, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

One illustration of Nimur's thought of ranking highly in a web search, might go some way to explaining Tango's question here. Perhaps Wikipedia simply ranks higher then Indian universities. Astronaut (talk) 19:26, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[Original reasearch] In my experience as a public library employee, the less experienced the user, the more likely they are to append ".com" to everything and expect to get the site the want, no matter what (and then complain when it's the wrong site or material offensive to their taste). This generally covers only the people who use free public internet, though, so I"m sure it's not representative. Mingmingla (talk) 22:54, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Google Image Search slows computer down on Fedora 17

Further problems with Fedora 17: When I go on Google to make a Google Image Search that returns very many image hits, and I click on several images to go to the websites they appear on, sooner or later my whole computer starts slowing down. Even moving the mouse becomes difficult. Linux System Monitor shows that the current CPU usage is well over 50%, sometimes near 100%, even though Firefox is the only program doing anything, and even it's only loading a new website or going back to the previous one. Especially going back to the search results list can take over five minutes, during which even moving the mouse is difficult. Once a page has loaded, browsing it is fairly easy, but still prone to minor slowness. Once I close the browser window, everything becomes normal again. This did not happen with Fedora 14. What could there be in Google Image Search that causes such slowness? JIP | Talk 19:13, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Have you checked the memory usage? A high level of paging can make things slow down like this.--Phil Holmes (talk) 08:50, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A runaway JS script, maybe?Уга-уга12 (talk) 13:34, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have found out that it's a problem specifically with Google Image Search. Browsing the results list, going to the preview page of a search result, or going back to the results list slows the computer down. Especially going back to the results list can grind the computer to a halt for minutes. Actually browsing any site a search result is found on works all OK. And if I spend enough time browsing a search result (in the order of several minutes), going back to the results list works OK. But if I go back after only a few seconds, the whole computer slows down. JIP | Talk 18:25, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A better window list applet for Cinnamon?

Still more problems with Fedora 17. After upgrading, I immediately noticed that neither the GNOME Shell or the old GNOME Panel in GNOME 3 were anywhere near to my liking. I agree with Linus Torvalds's criticism that the GNOME project seems to be actively trying to take control away from the user. So I installed Cinnamon, which seems to sort-of work like the old GNOME Panel did. But for my image editing purposes, I would need a window list applet that does the following:

If there are few enough windows for all of them to fit comfortably with their names in the taskbar, list them individually.
Otherwise, if one application has opened too many windows, group that application's windows into a single list item, clicking on which produces a vertical list of that application's windows, preferably with a tiny preview picture.

The default window list applet in Cinnamon doesn't do that. Instead, it tries to list every window separately, even when there are hundreds of them, making the individual items unusable. The window list of the GNOME Panel in Fedora 14 used to work the way I want.

And while I'm at it, is there a resources applet available? Such an applet should show tiny real-time graphs of CPU, memory, disk and network usage. (Not how much disk space is in use - how much the disk is being accessed.) Again, the GNOME Panel in Fedora 14 used to do this. JIP | Talk 19:46, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

August 29

Determining PDF page size programatically

I plan to batch-process a large number of PDF files (annotation using a combination of the ps2pdf utility of ghostscript, and pdftk stamp). It would be helpful if I from my script (or C++ program) could determine the page size (and orientation) of the first page of the PDF file. Any ideas about how that could be done? Thanks, --NorwegianBlue^talk 09:59, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ImageMagick's identify program will display something like

   foobar.pdf[0] PDF 612x792 612x792+0+0 16-bit Bilevel DirectClass 61KB 0.140u 0:00.160

with a [1] etc, for subsequent pages. -- Finlay McWalterჷTalk 10:38, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Where 612x792 appears to be the measurements in points -- Finlay McWalterჷTalk 10:44, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent, problem solved! Thanks for the quick reply! --NorwegianBlue^talk 11:18, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It turned out that ImageMagick's identify relies on ghostscript, which it crashed for every pdf I tried it on, resulting in pagefulls of postscript error messages on my system. (I have the most recent version of both packages). I then remembered the xpdf package, and sure enough, there is a pdfinfo utility that among other things returns the page size in points. Worked beautifully. I haven't tried it on documents containing mixed formats yet, but I could always handle those manually, if they turns out to be problematic. --NorwegianBlue^talk 21:09, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved

Integration of Intel Fortran 11.1 compiler with the Visual Studio 2008

I am trying to integrate Intel visual fortran compiler 11.1 with visual studio 2008. I have successfully installed both and I think I managed to integrate both to certain extent, because now I am getting visual fortran tab, where I make new project and all. I have a 64-bit system and Intel Xeon processor. When I write a fortran program and build it, it gives me the error, "Intel Visual Fortran Compiler for 'Win32' not installed". Please help me with the issue. I am not a programmer, so having problems understanding the nuances. Thanks - DSachan (talk) 12:38, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind, I think I managed it. DSachan (talk) 13:59, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved

Idea to transfer entire Fedora 17 Linux system to new 2 terabyte hard disk

I think I've come up with a "least troublesome" way of transferring my entire Fedora 17 Linux system to my new 2 terabyte hard disk:

Remove my old disks and put the new disk in.
Boot up with a Fedora 17 installation DVD and install the most minimum system.
Put my old disks back, along with the new disk.
Boot from either the old disks or the new disk, it doesn't really matter, as long as I end up in a working Linux system.
Transfer all the files from the old disks to the new disk, but keep /etc/fstab intact.
Remove my old disks once again.

If I have a bootable partition on both disks, do I get to somehow choose which disk I'm booting from? Or how will my computer decide it? Is such a thing even possible?

Will I automatically get my old user account when I transfer the entire root partition over to the new disk? Exactly how are user accounts stored in Linux? Is there a way to preserve user IDs on the destination when copying files? (But if I mess up the user IDs on the files, it won't really matter, I can always use chown.) JIP | Talk 17:43, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"If I have…"

Your computer will likely first attempt to boot from the first disk it sees, which is determined by the cable connection order and the BIOS (etc.)

"Will I automatically…"

Yes, but you could just as well just transfer it over without doing a fresh install and fix /etc/fstab (as explained already in one of your other items).

"Exactly how…"

If you copy everything, everything will be preserved.

¦ Reisio (talk) 17:53, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Further question: If I no longer will have any use for the old disks, I intend to sell them or give them away to my siblings. Despite 99.999999% of Finland's population using only Microsoft Windows and thus being unable (or at least not easily able) to read Linux disks, I would much rather not give their new owner access to all my personal files. Will removing all the files and/or reformatting the partitions be enough? What if I modify the partition table, deleting every partition on the disks? JIP | Talk 19:02, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Personally I find old disks handy for keeping an old backup (labelled "my system date ddmmyy", wrapped in an ESD bag, and stuffed in a cupboard somewhere). The aftermarket value of old disks is fairly minimal. If you want to blank a disk properly, dd /dev/zero over its entirety. -- Finlay McWalterჷTalk 19:10, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Will removing all the files and/or reformatting the partitions be enough?

Not quite (see Finlay's sugg). And yes, HDDs do not age that much, it's more that new HDDs are much faster than say, 5-year old drives were when they were new. The wear and tear is minimal -- if it had not been that way, they would have failed already.

If I have a bootable partition on both disks, do I get to somehow choose which disk I'm booting from?

On most bioses, I can press F11 and it lists all the block devices it found so far - including opticals but no USB HDDs on my machine. However, that F-key will probably depend on the manufacturer, and so will the range of detected drives. If F11 doesn't work, try to press pause early during booting - my TFT is too slow to pick up signal before it's over, so I cannot read the "Press F11 for Boot Devices menu" unless I pause the action.

I'm clueless though how the drives will be mapped if you have Linux on the secondary HDD, though. I did use Linux some time (on the primary), but its main use was to repair my Windows install when it was too screwed up to repair itself. Which happened about quarterly back then.

I'm using the boot device selection for Windows mainly but it can be useful for switching between Linux and Windoze in a cleaner way than relying on M$'s boot damager.

I mean 'manager.' - ¡Ouch! (^{hurt me} / _{more pain}) 08:14, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I did all of the above, except that at the end I didn't copy any of the files on the root partition across. Instead, I copied all the files on my two personal partitions - one for my main home directory and one for all my photographs - and then just reinstalled every package I had installed since I upgraded from Fedora 14 to Fedora 17. (I hadn't really done any changes to the root partition except for to install packages.) Then I shut down the computer, removed my old disks, and booted up. Everything worked OK. By copying my entire home directory, file for file, I got the exact same personal settings back even though they are now on a completely new disk. Now I only have to decide what to do with my old disks. I could either keep them, sell/give them to my company, sell/give them to my siblings, or try to sell them on the public market. If I'm going to sell them to strangers I intend to get some compensation, but I'll make an exception for my company or my siblings. My company is 100% Windows only, and both my brother-in-law and my brother use Windows, while my sister uses a Mac. None of them should be easily able to read Linux disks, but to be on the safe side, I'll probably dd /dev/zero on the whole disks anyway. JIP | Talk 18:04, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

One small comment though. When I plugged in my new disk and one of my old disks, the one that contained all my photographs, my computer refused to boot up. It appears it was trying to boot from the first disk it found on the SATA bus, but as the photograph disk didn't contain a bootable partition, it just froze. A reboot and a change in the BIOS settings fixed that problem. JIP | Talk 18:06, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

whois

In whois for google I see

Extended content

Server COM.whois-servers.net returned the following for GOOGLE.COM

GOOGLE.COM.ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.LOVE.AND.TOLERANCE.THE-WONDERBOLTS.COM
GOOGLE.COM.ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.HAVENDATA.COM
GOOGLE.COM.ZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.GET.ONE.MILLION.DOLLARS.AT.WWW.UNIMUNDI.COM
GOOGLE.COM.ZZZZZ.GET.LAID.AT.WWW.SWINGINGCOMMUNITY.COM
GOOGLE.COM.ZOMBIED.AND.HACKED.BY.WWW.WEB-HACK.COM
GOOGLE.COM.ZNAET.PRODOMEN.COM
GOOGLE.COM.Z.LOVE.AND.TOLERANCE.THE-WONDERBOLTS.COM
GOOGLE.COM.YUCEKIRBAC.COM
GOOGLE.COM.YUCEHOCA.COM
GOOGLE.COM.WORDT.DOOR.VEEL.WHTERS.GEBRUIKT.SERVERTJE.NET
GOOGLE.COM.VN
GOOGLE.COM.VABDAYOFF.COM
GOOGLE.COM.UY
GOOGLE.COM.UA
GOOGLE.COM.TW
GOOGLE.COM.TR
GOOGLE.COM.SUCKS.FIND.CRACKZ.WITH.SEARCH.GULLI.COM
GOOGLE.COM.SPROSIUYANDEKSA.RU
GOOGLE.COM.SPAMMING.IS.UNETHICAL.PLEASE.STOP.THEM.HUAXUEERBAN.COM
GOOGLE.COM.SOUTHBEACHNEEDLEARTISTRY.COM
GOOGLE.COM.SHQIPERIA.COM
GOOGLE.COM.SA
GOOGLE.COM.PEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEENIS.COM
GOOGLE.COM.PE
GOOGLE.COM.MY
GOOGLE.COM.MX
GOOGLE.COM.LOLOLOLOLOL.SHTHEAD.COM
GOOGLE.COM.LASERPIPE.COM
GOOGLE.COM.IS.NOT.HOSTED.BY.ACTIVEDOMAINDNS.NET
GOOGLE.COM.IS.HOSTED.ON.PROFITHOSTING.NET
GOOGLE.COM.IS.APPROVED.BY.NUMEA.COM
GOOGLE.COM.HK
GOOGLE.COM.HICHINA.COM
GOOGLE.COM.HAS.LESS.FREE.PORN.IN.ITS.SEARCH.ENGINE.THAN.SECZY.COM
GOOGLE.COM.ESJUEGOS.NET
GOOGLE.COM.DO
GOOGLE.COM.CO
GOOGLE.COM.CN
GOOGLE.COM.BR
GOOGLE.COM.BITERMANSOLUTIONS.COM
GOOGLE.COM.BEYONDWHOIS.COM
GOOGLE.COM.AU
GOOGLE.COM.AR
GOOGLE.COM.ALL.THE.PEOPLE.WHO.SPAM.THE.WHOIS.ARE.SERIOUSLY.ANNOYING.SOMEPONY.COM
GOOGLE.COM.AFRICANBATS.ORG
GOOGLE.COM.9.THE-WONDERBOLTS.COM
GOOGLE.COM.1.THE-WONDERBOLTS.COM
GOOGLE.COM

To single out one record, look it up with "xxx", where xxx is one of the
of the records displayed above. If the records are the same, look them up
with "=xxx" to receive a full display for each record.

>>> Last update of whois database: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 17:52:34 UTC <<<

What has happened here? Why is this random sometimes offensive spam in googles whois record?

Heh, that is an unusual form of spam. It looks like people have subdomains of their sites that start with google.com, so a whois search for google.com finds them. For some reason I don't understand, whois sites are blocked at my office, so I can't see if there is a simple way to exclude those from the search. It doesn't look like we have an article on whois spam. 209.131.76.183 (talk) 18:35, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, the whois response lets you know how to single one out. Just put quotes around the domain name. I'm still not sure what the plan is to drive people to their sites this way... 209.131.76.183 (talk) 18:41, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I don't believe the whois record is the target of them. They just have google.com subdomains to appear to be Google, for whatever reason that might be. OsmanRF34 (talk) 11:35, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notice the ZZZ domains at the top - it seems like they were picked so they would sort to the top of the list. They are registered as name servers, which is how they get subdomains into the list in the first place. I don't think there is any reason to have a nameserver with such an unusual domain name, and if there is it is also certainly for something shady. I'm still not sure what use this would be for spam or non-spam purposes. 209.131.76.183 (talk) 13:57, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm curious about how did you got this answer? I mean, what's this utility called? (Or what command did you used) 190.60.93.218 (talk) 12:58, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hard disk storage in the future

I just calculated that at my present rate of taking an average of 90 photographs a day (that figure is skewed by the times I visit events like the World Bodypainting Festival - on a normal working day, I take 20 photographs at the most), 20 terabytes of hard disk storage would be enough for the rest of my life. What my niece (she's now 1 year old) or any possible children I might ever have do with my old photographs won't be my problem any more. So what is the easiest and cheapest way of acquiring 20 terabytes of storage? It doesn't necessarily have to be on a magnetic hard disk, but on a local storage medium nevertheless. It should be taken into account that this won't be a problem until about a decade afterwards. Is there any estimate on how storage technology will develop at that time? JIP | Talk 19:23, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

3TB hard drives are available quite readily these days, so 8 of those would get you 20GB (factoring in loss of space due to file allocation table). But since hard drive capacities are increasing regularly and the price (usually) stable or going down it makes more sense to acquire storage space as needed. Also unless you are planning to keep the same camera, camera resolutions also increasing so future photographs will use more space so your calculations may be off. In regards to estimates, Moore's law and Kryder's Law are interesting AvrillirvA (talk) 19:47, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with this. The rest of your life is a very long time to extrapolate things, and by the time you've filled one 3TB disc there will probably be much larger storage available. If you do want 20TB now, I recommend some redundancy. With 8 discs, you'll probably see at least one failure. I would keep at least two copies of everything, and every 5-10 years it might not be a bad idea to get new discs and transfer the data to prevent losing data to discs dying of old age. You could also get a NAS device - it would let you put an array of discs in it allowing you to have access to the 20TB on your network, and would have built in support for keeping redundant data and warning about disc failures. 209.131.76.183 (talk) 19:53, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I would suggest backups rather then just redundancy. In particular, relying on a NAS device or any other similar setup as the sole source of redundancy is fairly risky. For starters there is no geographical redundancy so if your house or wherever the NAS device is stored catches fire and takes the NAS device with it, having 100 copies doesn't help. And a single device also runs the risk of something like a power surge taking out multiple hard disks. Further, even a well made NAS device runs some risk from malware or file system problems losing data no matter how many copies are supposed to exist. The risk can be kept to a minimum if you know what you're doing but in all likelihood if you're asking questions about it on the RD you don't. In other words, similar to a bog standard RAID setup, redundancy even in a NAS device is more important for avoiding downtime then protecting data although it also helps with data between backup. If you can afford multiple, sure go for a NAS or RAID setup and remote backups and whatever else. But if you can only afford one, it makes far more sense to have at least one backup stored in a remote location updated resonably often. Nil Einne (talk) 16:09, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Did your calculations take into account that the filesizes of your pictures are all but guaranteed to grow? You don't plan on shooting at 16MP for the rest of your life, do you? The Masked Booby (talk) 01:57, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

3TB hard drives are available quite readily these days, so 8 of those would get you 20GB

20TB obviously. And since bitmaps (high quality photos at least) are large files, FAT granularity doesn't hit you nearly as hard. If you have a RAID-5, you'd have 21TB altogether, and I'd say that would still amount to enough space to store 20TB of bitmap files.

Still I'd say, backup regularly (shouldn't be hard on media, as most of the photos won't change, so you don't have to backup the same files again and again).

And be sure to validate the data. That is, keep checksums for the files, and compare regularly if they still apply. Silent data corruption is a killer.

And don't be TOO worried about >16MP resolutions. The human eye has only so much resolution, and going past that point (which might be more than 16MP though, I'm nowhere near expert level at that) is quite pointless. Camera manufacturers will keep saying that it ain't, but in the same vein I'll keep saying that they're a bunch of dazed PR guys. ;) - ¡Ouch! (^{hurt me} / _{more pain}) 08:15, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

So it's obvious I need geographical redundancy. Having 200 petabytes of storage at home won't be any good if my apartment is destroyed in a fire. I think what I should first do is get a lot of 1 TB or 2 TB USB hard disks (I currently have two, but I would need at least one or two more), and develop a scheme where I constantly keep at least one in a safe remote site, say a bank deposit box, and regularly swap the disk at the remote site with one at home, so the remote site gets an up-to-date backup. But there's one question that keeps bothering me: Data corruption can just as well strike my original hard drive as any of the backup drives. Depending on which has failed, I need to do different things to fix it. How can I check for such occasions most easily? JIP | Talk 08:04, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

IE8 new version opening PDFs in Acrobat

Running Windows 7, which came with both IE8 (unknown bit number) and IE8 64-bit installed. For reasons that I can't understand, the unknown-bit-number browser recently started to take a long time to open new tabs (nearly a minute sometimes), and because I often run with lots of tabs at the same time (the main reason I refuse to use IE9), this wastes a ton of time, so I've just started to use the 64-bit version. For reasons that I can't understand, when I hold down ctrl and click on a link to a PDF, it insists on opening the PDF in Acrobat instead of opening it in a new tab, which is what would happen if I clicked this way on a link to an HTML page in this browser or on a link to a PDF page in the old browser. Any ideas on how to stop this? I've gone to Tools/Internet Options and played around with the General/Tabs settings, but this still happens even though I've selected the "A new tab in the current window" option at "Open links from other programs in". Browsers are versions 8.0.7601.17514 (unknown bit) and 8.0.7601.17514CO (64-bit edition). I've looked around for webpages that discuss this problem, but I can't find anything. Nyttend (talk) 21:09, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The "unknown bit" version will be 32-bit. The reason the behavior is different between the two versions is that 32-bit plugins (such as the Adobe Reader one which renders a pdf in the IE window) only work on the 32-bit version. I do not know if Adobe offer a 64-bit version of their plugin, but if they do installing that would solve your issue. AvrillirvA (talk) 21:29, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Operating systems

Hi. How many Source lines of code do the following operating systems consist of:

Windows Vista?
Windows 7?
OS X Mountain Lion?
Ubuntu? --41.129.34.34 (talk) 23:07, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The first three don't release (all) their source code, so it's hard to answer. As to Ubuntu, what do you mean by "operating system"? Just the kernel, or the standard tools as well, or the desktop environment (which?) as well, or the apps (which?) as well? It's hard to draw the line. Marnanel (talk) 23:11, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Any rough estimations would be welcome. About Ubuntu I mean the operating system including all the packages and tools on the standard CD that can be downloaded from the Ubuntu website. --41.178.232.21 (talk) 08:26, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article lists some figures (somehow) for NT through to Windows Server 2003, and for various versions of Debian and for OS X 10.4, so it can't be that hard to answer (if you're not a stickler for the answer being meaningful). Card Zero (talk) 10:04, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Since you'll accept rough estimates, here's a blog post from a Windows developer [1] which says that Vista is said to have over 50 million lines of code. Card Zero (talk) 09:44, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

FWIW, http://windows.microsoft.com/en-US/windows/history says "Windows XP is compiled from 45 million lines of code." Vista and 7 are probably similar but a bit larger. It's hard to know what this includes, though. MS Paint and Minesweeper? I suspect so. Internet Explorer? I suspect not. Those gigantic video card and printer drivers? They're not written by Microsoft, but Microsoft probably has the source code, so I'm not sure. -- BenRG (talk) 18:29, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Do you intend to count the lines-of-source required to write a compiler that can compile an operating system? Next question: do you intend to count the lines-of-source required to write a compiler that can compile a compiler that can compile an operating system? This is called the bootstrapping problem. Of course, this isn't an infinite recursion; but it's a lot of recursion. At some point, you have to acknowledge that "lines of source" is about the most useless way to measure software complexity. Even man-hours is a much more meaningful approximation, though even those are a statistical fallacy well-known to software-engineers. Nimur (talk) 17:20, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

August 30

Smart TV software updates

Hi, on a Samsung "Smart TV", one of the software update options is called "By Channel", described as downloading the update "over broadcast signal" (other options being over the Internet and from USB). What kind of "broadcast signal" would that be referring to? I am in the UK if that matters. 86.160.215.12 (talk) 01:31, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Freeview (UK) carries TV software updates on one of its channels. I nearly fell off my sofa when my Sony TV first announced that it had received a software update and was intent on installing it. See, for instance, this schedule. --Tagishsimon (talk) 01:37, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(OP) Really, I didn't know that... Thanks for the quick reply. 86.177.106.27 (talk) 01:57, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Popups

I have a website which should be advert free. Occasionally a pop up screen appears. How do I stop it so it doesnt appear for other people? Kittybrewster ☎ 11:42, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I had a poke around your website, but didn't get any popups or popunders. Then again, I have fairly robust popup blockers. It might help us to know where you are having the problem, and what steps can reproduce it. It's always possible that it's not something on your website at all - if it occurs when navigating from an external site, that site could be using an 'exit popup' - that is, a window that only appears when you navigate away from it. - Cucumber Mike (talk) 11:52, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Or it could be malware on your own machine causing the popups. --Mr.98 (talk) 12:25, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Carefully consider any third-party code you have added to your page (for statistics, counters, and so on). For example, this 2005 thread on the Straight Dope Message Board suggests a nedstatbasic.net image causes a pop-up the first time a visitor loads it, but sets a cookie to prevent the pop-up from re-appearing. If any of your visitors are using browsers from 2005, maybe they're experiencing something similar. --Bavi H (talk) 02:55, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

iOS's Safari cannot upload files

Why does the Safari web browser built into iOS cannot upload files? 27.64.9.171 (talk) 13:00, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Is a hard disk drive a type of RAM?

Hard disk drive states in second paragraph that "Hard drives are classified as non-volatile, random access, ....." but Random-access memory says "In contrast, other data storage media such as hard disks, CDs, DVDs and magnetic tape read and write data only in a predetermined order....."--Gauravjuvekar (talk) 16:07, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think hard disks and CDs/DVDs are always classified as random access, but they aren't classified as memory. "Memory" only covers RAM and ROM. Of course, ROM is random-access and it is memory, but it isn't RAM. And data CDs are called CD-ROMs but they aren't ROM and aren't memory. Basically the definitions make no sense. I'll try to fix the lede of the RAM article at some point if no one else does. -- BenRG (talk) 16:49, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is another case of "standard terminology" not being so standard. "Random access" is being used in two different ways: in the hard disk drive article, to mean all data is addressable; and in the random-access memory article, to mean all data access takes equal time.

Nearly all file APIs provide some method for byte- or word- addressability - especially if they present the files as though they are mapped to memory. However, internal to the disk controller driver, or the file system implementation, nearly all hard disks addressed by sector; and many file-systems are paged into RAM. The details vary between each product, driver, file system, and operating system. So, every byte is accessible ("random access", according to the first meaning). But, spatial locality dictates that some bytes can be accessed faster than others (not "random access", according to the second meaning). Nimur (talk) 17:02, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Modern DRAM is organized into rows and there is a delay in switching from one row to another. It's really a difference of degree, not kind. For RAM the random access penalty is a few nanoseconds, for a hard disk it's a few milliseconds, for CDs it's a few tenths of a second, and for tape it's a few minutes. It's somewhat arbitrary where you draw the line, but I think CDs are always considered random access media and tapes usually aren't. -- BenRG (talk) 19:47, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Surely the reason for this is that, with tape you have to read through all the data between where you are and where you want to be, so it's purely serial. With disks, you can skip across unwanted data, so it's not serial and is traditionally called random. --Phil Holmes (talk) 08:58, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I like Phil's definition: if it's serial it's not random-access. that's how I always understood the phrase. But I suspect there's no good consensus about what the term exactly means. I'd be glad if someone proved me wrong on that point. Shadowjams (talk) 19:14, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Is that even correct though? Our [2] while somewhat confusing seems to suggest it is not with most modern tapes. You can normally just quickly wind to the correct position even if quickly here is still quite a while. (I.E. You don't have to read all the data in between.) It's still true you have to wind the tape, unlike with optical media and hard disks or even floppy disks where you just have to reposition the head (with the discs constantly moving) but I don't know whether you can really say this makes it purely serial. If we imagine a 'tape' system where instead of in a casette the tape is stretched along a very long line and head head has to move along the tape, with not moving at all, is this really that different from the disc systems (yes the tape isn't moving unlike with discs, but I don't see why that makes it more 'serial'.) P.S. I'm not sure whether you find the exact right position of a tape straight away but I don't think you can with most optical media either. P.P.S. I'm not saying tapes should be considered random access, rather saying BenRG seems to be correct. It's an arbitary line. While the tape article is somewhat unclear as I mentioned, my impression is that's basically what it's saying. With a tape, the difference between sequential and random access is so great that they normally aren't considered random access. Nil Einne (talk)

Google Doesn't Work

No matter what I enter or where I enter it, either in the Google homepage or in the bar at the top of the screen, all I get is a blank page with "done" at the bottom. I've scanned thouroughly for viruses and waited a long time but still nothing. What can be done? If I switch to Bing at the top of the screen it works. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.77.196.198 (talk) 17:02, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There are a number things which may be causing this. You didn't say what browser or OS you are using, but from the information you have given I would guess a version of Internet Explorer. Do you have any other browsers on your system, such as Firefox or Opera with which to test? This would help determine whether the problem is being caused by the browser or something else, so that we can concentrate our troubleshooting efforts more effectively. If not, with the blank "done" page loaded in Internet Explorer, go to "View" -> "Source" to display the html code of the page. If you see a mostly empty page with "<META HTTP-EQUIV="Refresh" CONTENT=" this is an issue with Internet Explorers meta refresh settings and you will need to change them by going to "Tools" -> "Internet options" -> "Security" -> "Custom level", scroll down to the "Allow META REFRESH" setting at change it to "Enable". Clearing the browser cache/history at this point would probably be a good idea too. If this didn't solve the issue, then we should check that your internet connection is routing traffic properly to googles servers. Do this by opening the command prompt and type

tracert google.com

You will then see the route your connection takes to the google server, and the result should end at a hop named "______.1e100.net" If you don't see this, then there is something wrong with the connection, perhaps a routing issue on your ISP, or your host file has been altered (possibly by a virus or malware). The host file article explains where to locate the file on your system. Open it with notepad and if there are any entries for google, remove them (do not remove or add anything else though). If none of this solved the issue, please post back with more information about which browser, version, and operating system you are using AvrillirvA (talk) 20:07, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dear AvrillirvA, Thank you so much for your detailed reply. My Google hadn't been working for a week. I have two PCs connected to the same line, so I knew it wasn't the internet connection routing traffic improperly because the other one worked. I just now turned on my PC and went straight to this page, printed it, and then went to the Google homepage. I keyed in "Mitt Romney" and before I could even hit enter the page was filled. I hadn't changed anything since it didn't work. I did check out the "<META HTTP-EQUIV="Refresh" CONTENT=", page was full. I also checked META REFRESH and it was already on enable. I can't explain why this problem healed itself but now, thanks to you, I'll know what to do if this problem ever comes back. Thank you again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.77.196.198 (talk) 16:50, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

August 31

Encoding in Command Prompt

Hi. I use Windows 7. I want to use the Command Prompt (cmd.exe) to move a file between two directories. The problem is that the file name is in non-Latin characters (UTF-8), so, when I type its name in the prompt it is converted to question marks. How can I make the Command Prompt display UTF-8 characters? (P.S. I know that I can rename the file using Windows but this doesn't solve my problem.) --41.129.101.27 (talk) 02:26, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This probably won't solve it, but is worth a try: In XP you can click on the icon on the far left of the title bar, then select Properties, which brings up a pop-up menu. From there you can pick the Fonts tab. Now XP doesn't seem to have any fonts which support unicode, but perhaps Win 7 does. StuRat (talk) 02:33, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Doesn't work. The only fonts there are Consolas, Lucida Console and Raster Fonts. Maybe I can use an external program that supports UTF-8? --41.129.101.27 (talk) 02:46, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

According to this page you can make a font available by adding it to HKLM\Software\Microsoft\WindowsNT\CurrentVersion\Console\TrueTypeFont. However, you should be able to move the file even if you can't see its name in the current font, unless you're using a third-party command-line tool that isn't Unicode aware. UTF-8 has nothing to do with this, by the way: Windows stores filenames as UTF-16 and the console window and cmd.exe both use UTF-16 internally. -- BenRG (talk) 04:07, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Try this: In the Command Prompt properties, try changing the font to either Consolas or Lucida Console. (I don't think Raster Fonts will work.) Then at the command prompt, enter chcp 65001 to set the code page to Unicode UTF-8. --Bavi H (talk) 03:35, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I know chcp will have no effect on cmd.exe, since it uses wide characters internally. -- BenRG (talk) 04:07, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. I noticed when pasting characters into the Command Prompt, they were correctly displayed (if they were available in the font) and were interpreted correctly by commands, no matter what the code page was set to. I wasn't sure if typing characters on the keyboard also worked and didn't change the keyboard layout to test.

Setting the code page does seem to affect how cmd.exe interprets bytes in files when it displays them on the screen, for example, when you use more file.txt. Here are some additional tests someone conducted. I haven't yet found official documentation that details the effects chcp has in cmd.exe, there might be other effects or consequences we haven't noticed. --Bavi H (talk) 02:22, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

An alternative solution to this problem would be to use a copy program which can read the filename from a text file. FastCopy can do this, the command would be fastcopy.exe /srcfile_w="files.txt" /to=newdirectory AvrillirvA (talk) 03:40, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Try typing part of the name and hitting the Tab key. That normally completes the command, and may insert the characters you need automatically.--Phil Holmes (talk) 08:56, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If all you want to do is move the file, try using wildcards to represent the non-typable characters. Eg, move abc*.def. Obviously you need a combination that covers the file you want to move and not any files that you don't want to move. Mitch Ames (talk) 06:48, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Java Question

In Java, what does the 24 refer to in the following: return String.format( "%24s: %s\n%24s: %s", ..., ... ,..., ... ); ? And similarly: return String.format( "%02d:%02d:%02d", ..., ..., ... ); ? Thanks. 92.6.157.179 (talk) 11:29, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The java manual page about this is here. It works like printf in C - the %24s expects a string of 24 characters (shorter strings will be padded with spaces); the %02d will output an integer with a minimum of 2 digits and a leading zero if there is only one digit (often used when outputting dates like 31/08/2012). Astronaut (talk) 13:03, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Astronaut! Much appreciated! happy editing! 92.6.157.179 (talk) 14:04, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unix Command Syntax

The Unix man command uses a specific notation to describe the correct syntax of a command. Alternate options are separated by vertical '|' symbols, and optional arguments are surrounded by [brackets].

Is there a name for this format, and/or an article about it?

and how would I specify "You must use at least one of the options -a,-b,-c and -d; you can also use option -e"?

Thanks, Rojomoke (talk) 13:33, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I don't quite know (I'd say it's some convention loosely based on EBNF or regexp syntax and doesn't have a name), but maybe you'll find further pointers (he he) in the GNU and POSIX guidelines concerning command-line interfaces 92.224.244.40 (talk) 16:12, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Since the point is to be helpful to users, I would explain anything as complex as that in the text of the man page rather than asking the user to decipher some obscure symbology. Note also that even more important than having a good man page is to give a good explanation if the user types your command with a --help option. Looie496 (talk) 16:27, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your second question might be answered:

mycommand -a|-b|-c|-d [-e]

--Sean 20:38, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It's not a formally-defined "format", so I doubt there's a specific name for (or Wikipedia article about) it. (We do have a Man page article, but it doesn't discuss these details.)

The second link provided by a previous poster gives specific advice about the format of the SYNOPSIS section, but I've found very few others. (Evidently, very few people have asked the question you're asking, and even fewer have answered it.) —Steve Summit (talk) 12:05, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Automatic Update Failing

I leave my computer on overnight (for various reasons), and recently I have been waking up to find that it has restarted itself. When I login to Windows I get a message saying Windows Update has failed to install. This has been going on for a few weeks. I manually installed the update and the message said it installed successfully, but somehow this problem persists. It keeps checking for updates every night and failing to install the same ones, again and again. What should I do? Win7 Home Premium. KägeTorä - (影虎) (TALK) 14:05, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Removing "Live Security Platform" malware

How can one get rid of the malware "Live Security Platform" once it has installed itself and disabled measures such as using the normal means of removing a program? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.220.239.210 (talk) 17:56, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I assume you mean "Live Security Platinum". Try the instructions here. -- BenRG (talk) 18:27, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

can a microsite be under a different person's control?

could I produce a page and have it be on my servers, while it is at mypage.theirpage.com, right in DNS (so if someone types only mypage.theirpage.com then it gets right to my page without ever hitting theirs)? I'm asking because I don't fully trust them to report visitors correctly otherwise. If I can't do it right in dns, what's the closest I can come where we don't have to trust each other? Thanks. --80.99.254.208 (talk) 18:48, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

They can certainly make yoursite.theirdomain.com resolve to an IP address that's entirely out of their control (hosted in a different location with an unaffiliated ISP), but you have to trust them to do that much. If they're merely incompetent, they're less likely to screw this up than visitor reporting. If they're malicious, you can't safely use their domain. -- BenRG (talk) 22:18, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, BenRG, but can't I test where yoursite.theirdomain.com resolves myself? While it can start resolving somewhere other than my IP that I give them, if I have a script that checks from time to time, I can know immediately, can't I? I ask because the same is not true for visitor reporting. So is it at least "tamper-evident" - or can they resolve it "correctly" as far as I can tell (that microsite goes to my IP) while stealing some of the traffic? Isn't this done at the DNS level which I can verify? --80.99.254.208 (talk) 06:52, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Is nslookup yoursite.theirdomain.com what you're looking for? --NorwegianBlue^talk 08:27, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

September 1

'Transcluding' forum posts, possibly through RSS?

Would it be possible to transclude (using the Wikipedia definition) posts on phpBB forums, say, or even Yahoo! Answers on blogs like Livejournal, or anywhere at all with some code? (I was thinking about RSS since that's sort of how it works, but not sure if it could be transcluded in this manner.) 62.255.129.19 (talk) 00:01, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Spam emails from myself

I get at least 20 spam emails every day from my own full name, first and last and I do not have a common name. It all stems from one Canadian pharmacy order years ago (the drugs when they arrived were shipped from India so I doubt the website was really Canadian). I get at least 100 spams a day, mostly for viagra and other drugs. Anyway, I've set my filters really well, so I only have about five spam messages that get through to my inbox. But I am a bit worried that if they're sending my name to me (which doesn't seem the best method for getting me to open up the email since I know it's not from me) they must be sending these to lots of people. If my name was like John Smith, I wouldn't worry, but anyone can Google my name and they will only find me. Is there anything I can do?--108.54.25.10 (talk) 01:45, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing at all; the spammers and scammers have resold your name to one another (on massive lists) and now you, and random other people, get mails faked to look like you sent them. There's always drastic measures. 90.205.90.201 (talk) 10:27, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Spammers are not known for the sophistication of their marketing tactics, or their spelling or grammar. (Fortunately, this does make them rather obvious to most people.) Yes it's a pain and there's not a lot anyone can do about it, apparently. What I do is filter all that sort of spam into a separate folder/label and forward everything else to a new email address, and then only use the new address. (I hope you didn't ingest those dubious drugs.)--Shantavira|^{feed me} 15:25, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It has been suggested that scammers use deliberately bad English because they're looking for stupid people. If you're the type of person who'd say "Come on, no one at the FBI would use that phrasing, and don't they think I've heard of Nigeria before?"— then the message is not intended for you. —Tamfang (talk) 04:46, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Those other people will get mails with their name as sender, not yours, otherwise you (and a lot of other people) would have received at least a few angry mails in return. It may just be a way to minimize traffic due to bounced mail (spammers don't want more bad press than they're already getting). Often there's a whole list of e-mail addresses in the to: or cc: field, if that's the case then your name may appear in other people's spam as well but I doubt people pay much attention to those. Ssscienccce (talk) 15:49, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There is also a spamming technique in which the sender's email address is spoofed as the recipient's email address. I am not sure why this is done, but I suspect it is done to get through the filters. If any mail you 'sent' yourself contains words filtered out by the spam filter, it will most likely be delivered, because the server thinks you sent it yourself. On a side note, I have a btinternet address, which I used to use for work, but now I hardly ever use it, because I get 40-50 spam emails (from 'work on the internet' jobs, and all from btinternet addresses, including my own) every day, and BT only label it as spam, and send it to your inbox anyway. I wouldn't worry about it. I have a very unique name, too, but I don't get complaining emails, because it is such a well-known and widespread problem with this particular email service, that no-one cares. I would suspect that to be the case with yours, too. Just google 'spam [+ your email provider]', or contact them directly. KägeTorä - (影虎) (TALK) 20:29, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disk usage differences between ext3 and ext4?

When I installed my new 2 terabyte hard disk, I copied everything from my two personal partitions (one for my main files, one for my photographs) across to the new disk. But after I had done that, disk usage reports (both du and System Monitor) reported slightly less usage on the new partitions than on the old ones. It was in the order of about .1% to 1% difference. I had made sure I copied all the hidden files and directories too by not using cp -rp /oldhome/jip/* . but instead cp -rp /oldhome/jip /home, as * fails to expand to any hidden files or directories (I think this is by design). But the cp command finished OK, and so far it seems that all the files are there. Is this because my old partitions were ext3 but my new ones are ext4, and ext4 somehow makes more efficient use of disk space? JIP | Talk 18:13, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Full version of MS Office or Starter for Netbook?

I recently purchased an ASUS Eee PC Seashell series with a 1.6 Ghz Intel Atom processor, Win 7 Starter and 1GB of RAM. I am looking to install Microsoft Office 2010 on it to take notes for class. Given the hardware limitations of a netbook, would you recommend that I install the full version or the Starter version? In other words, is there a difference between system resource usage between the two versions that will lead to a difference in speed? Also, would an earlier version of MS Office run faster?

Thanks. Acceptable (talk) 22:00, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It seems that the Starter Edition is basically the full edition with various features disabled (but apparently not removed from the programs code)[3] and adverts added. If that is the case then it would presumably use similar resources as the full version. Older versions will certainly run faster; I use Word 97 and with a dozen documents open it is only consuming 6.8MB of RAM AvrillirvA (talk) 01:05, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You may want to consider using web or 'cloud'-based software such as Google Docs which would presumably not require the system resources required for Microsoft Office. Chevy monte carlo 09:34, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

September 2