Talk:Lily van Java

Lily van Java has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: August 25, 2012.

Film Unassessed

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Indonesia B‑class Low‑importance

	Indonesia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indonesia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Indonesia and Indonesia-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IndonesiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndonesiaTemplate:WikiProject IndonesiaIndonesia
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from Lily van Java appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 25 August 2012 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that 1928's Lily of Java was the first Chinese-produced film in Indonesia?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2012/August. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Lily van Java.

Wikipedia

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Lily van Java/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: TBrandley (talk · contribs) 05:01, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'll take this one. Cheers, TBran dl ey 05:01, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox: Add actors per production section
- Not done exactly as you suggested, but noted
Lede: film. En-dash should be em-dash after that "film"
- Either is acceptable, per WP:MDASH.
Lede: "Details on its cast and performance are contradictory, although the film is recognised as the first of a long series of ethnic Chinese-produced films in the country". Any reference?
- In #Release and reception, but I'll cite as well.
Lede: "It is likely lost." → "It is likely a lost film."
- Done
Premise: Wow, very small. Any way of expanding?
- I'll take another look, but I don't have high hopes. Pareh had the same issue.
  - Nothing in Biran or Said; Biran just adds "the film had a simple story and showed a lot of tennis" and Said quotes an earlier work by Biran which says the same thing.
Production: Missing comma before "respectively"
- Done.
Production: "General Motors" is missing "(GM)" at the end, as per MOS:ACRO
- Not done, as the acronym is not actually used.
References: "Footnotes" and "Bibliography" should be actual sub-sections per MOS:ACCESS.
- Done.

Though the article is small, because its lost, its still pretty solid. That's all above. On hold for now. TBran dl ey 02:21, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OK. This article looks good. It'll pass. Congrats. TBran dl ey 14:02, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:06, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]