Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Programmable automation controller

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Ruud Koot (talk | contribs) at 20:58, 23 August 2012 (Programmable automation controller: q). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Programmable automation controller (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Spammy WP:NEO and WP:CFORK. This is one vendor's neologism for their own product, which sets out to distance itself from its competitor's Programmable logic controllers by inventing a new term for itself. No sourcing other than from Opto22 and ARC themselves. Andy Dingley (talk) 17:37, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. More than one manufacturer sells something described as "Programmable Automation Controller" - some sell a shoebox-sized PLC under this name, Foxboro uses it for their "high end" controller. Since it's a marketing term with no commonly accepted differentiator from "programmable controller", it coudl be deleted and if needed a mention made at "programmable controller".--Wtshymanski (talk) 18:05, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. 19:18, 22 August 2012 (UTC) I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 19:18, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yes the article is spammy, and yes it has been monopolized by SPA/POV to one vendor. It's a mess and needs fixed, and the external links go nowhere toward showing notability per GNG. Unfortunately this is a notable concept that is not a neologism but happens to be saddled with a terrible article. Most vendors make both PLCs and PACs, so the theory that it's a single manufacturer's product name is inaccurate. The nominator can be excused for not finding much towards notability with normal searches, as good editorial is buried amid volumes of product and news release data. However, if you look [|here] and [|Here] you'll find sufficient references for notability. I may take on improving the article if time permits, but for now I have to say Keep and fix. Celtechm (talk) 02:36, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    • Comment This [1] says a PAC is a personal computer running LabView. This [2] says something similar. This [3] says a PAC is an "advanced" PLC ( every PLC since the PLC/2 has been an "advanced" PLC). These guys [4] describe a "programmable automation controller" that very much resembles a PLC. Someone called "Control Technology Corporation" was selling a "Model 2800 Programmable Automation Controller" in 1985, when Bill Gates was still trying to get Solitare to shuffle the cards. (Google Books Machine design: Volume 57, Issues 13-19 1985). Who is the ARC? Is it more than just one vendor? --Wtshymanski (talk) 13:34, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
They're not PLCs. Andy Dingley (talk) 20:06, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
That's not exactly what you seem to be saying above? —Ruud 20:58, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]