Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Service Oriented Architecture Fundamentals
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Scottywong (talk | contribs) at 16:39, 23 August 2012 (Closing debate, result was delete). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.Revision as of 16:39, 23 August 2012 by Scottywong (talk | contribs) (Closing debate, result was delete)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -Scottywong| express _ 16:39, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Service Oriented Architecture Fundamentals (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Doesn't contain anything not already included in "Service Oriented Architecture". In addition other problems such as bad layout and factual errors. → Adrian Lozano (talk) 12:48, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. 23:48, 16 August 2012 (UTC) • Gene93k (talk) 23:48, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- delete What is this mess? C- at A level. Andy Dingley (talk) 23:59, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - There's already plenty of SOA articles. This is redundant. Jojalozzo 16:19, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Concoction of bits and pieces of actual SOA architectures, held together by a bit of "misunderstood" and a lot of "simply incorrect". Cannot meet WP:GNG in its current form, since it is incorrect. Cannot be improved to a real article due to WP:NOTMANUAL. Cannot be a redirect to Service-oriented architecture due to unlikeliness of this name as a search term. -- BenTels (talk) 17:58, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.