Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Find and replace

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete, Wikipedia is not a how-to guide. JIP | Talk 06:05, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I'm in agreement with JIP. Find and replace is undoubtedly a useful feature in word processing, but the article falls in line with both WP:NOTHOWTO and WP:NOTDIC. I, Jethrobot ^{drop me a line} (note: not a bot!) 09:11, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep we comment on the topic here which is certainly valid for an encyclopedia. Also I criticize the actions of the nominator SarahStierch who said in their edit summary page triage, when they obviously intended page destruction not repair. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:30, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If the article should be kept, I'd like to see an argument why. Claiming that it's "certainly valid" and then criticizing the nominator offers no particular evidence to support keeping the article. I, Jethrobot ^{drop me a line} (note: not a bot!) 16:49, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]