Jump to content

Talk:GNU coding standards

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by SineBot (talk | contribs) at 15:35, 12 August 2012 (Signing comment by 60.240.145.232 - "Removed un-encyclopedic sentence: Not only unencyclopaedic, but incorrect."). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
WikiProject iconComputing Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Line length

Do the GNU Coding Standards say anything about line length? – 89.8.40.93 (talk) 17:26, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Removed un-encyclopedic sentence

I removed the following, which feels subjective: it can be a good idea for most authors of free Unix programs to follow the standards — whether or not their programs are officially part of the GNU Project. Perhaps it can be reformulated on the form "XXYYZZ suggests that ...", if someone can find a good reference. --Erik 14:46, 16 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not only subjective, but wrong — see the Linux Kernel Coding Style guide, the first two chapters of which make some cogent points against the GNU style. Should a criticism section be added to the article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.240.145.232 (talk) 15:34, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Rationale?

What's the rationale behind this formatting? What is it based on? Why have the mentioned decisions been made? Since it's radically different from common code formatting, there has to be a reason, right? I think article deserves a section for that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.91.30.226 (talk) 07:48, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. What is the history of the style? Valcumine (talk) 02:48, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Vegaswikian (talk) 01:19, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]



GNU Coding StandardsGNU coding standards

Even the GNU uses lower case ([www.gnu.org/prep/standards/html_node/]): "The GNU coding standards, last updated ..."

Per WP:CAPS ("Wikipedia avoids unnecessary capitalization") and WP:TITLE, this is a generic, common term, not a propriety or commercial term, so the article title should be downcased. Lowercase will match the formatting of related article titles. Tony (talk) 03:45, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.