This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Wizardman(talk | contribs) at 22:36, 8 August 2012(Reassess DYK articles as not stub using AWB). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.Revision as of 22:36, 8 August 2012 by Wizardman(talk | contribs)(Reassess DYK articles as not stub using AWB)
This article is within the scope of WikiProject C/C++, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of C and C++ topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.C/C++Wikipedia:WikiProject C/C++Template:WikiProject C/C++C/C++
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
A fact from Windows Template Library appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 28 April 2005. The text of the entry was as follows:
I'm going to remove every last POV phrase related to lack of support or documentation. I wonder what would happen if I edited some open source project's page on WP and added things like "though created by IBM|RedHat, it is not supported" or "this application has no documentation whatsoever, so a few people started a project to do that, yikes". And WTL is supported, if you're willing to pay for that. Kinda like RedHat. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.10.219.36 (talk)
If such open source libraries are developed but unsupported, the only reasonable thing to do for their articles would be to add that information. Just because such information may be lacking elsewhere, doesn't mean that information should be taken away from this one. The net result of that action would be a worsening of Wikipedia's quality, not an improvement. Always try being constructive. As for the reason this is brought up here, it is probably particularly because Microsoft used to support the library. If you can get paid support for this library, yes, then that should be added to the article too. I don't quite understand why you didn't, because that seemed like not too well-known information and would be useful to have here, as well as whom to contact. — Northgrove11:21, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
