Jump to content

Talk:CryptoLogic

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Salvidrim! (talk | contribs) at 17:28, 4 August 2012 (WPVG initial assess). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
WikiProject iconGambling Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Gambling, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Gambling on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Note icon
An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.
WikiProject Gambling To-do:

Things you can do

  • Current collaborations:
Improve an article to FA
Improve an article to A
  • Help with the Gambling articles needing attention.
  • Tag the talk pages of Gambling-related articles with the {{WikiProject Gambling}} banner.
  • The link to the Missouri gambling site is now out of date and needs to be updated.
  • Japan section reads as though it was written by the gambling industry - quotes of 160% returns are 'citation needed'.
WikiProject iconVideo games Stub‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on the project's quality scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Opening heading

The nature of this article was never intended to be one of advertising, thinly-veiled or otherwise. It's intention was to be an article detailing an accurate background of the company and how it has progressed over time with relevance to industry competitors, such as Playtech and Microgaming. I have seen articles on these companies but found them to be far too simple and, in my opinion, not comprehensive enough. All of the information is factual, objective and thoroughly researched. Please advise me more specifically in the areas where the article can be improved.ElNino77 12:26, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think even if it isn't advertisement, you'd still have a difficult time establishing notability. -Taco325i 18:29, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Well, the problem is that all the information in the article comes directly from the company or its employees (presumably, since no sources were cited) and that's not neutral. The best way to fix this is to cite reliable sources such as reviews in business magazines, newspapers, etc. ColourBurst 23:37, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]