This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related
This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Writing systems, a WikiProject interested in improving the encyclopaedic coverage and content of articles relating to writing systems on Wikipedia. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project’s talk page.Writing systemsWikipedia:WikiProject Writing systemsTemplate:WikiProject Writing systemsWriting system
This page is actually quite interesting and valuable in understanding China's intellectual history. However, it is poorly written, and the first section and second section essentially repeat the same information. Moreover, the broader picture is not given. A person reading this would have difficulty figuring out what the fuss is all about.
The assertion that "In reality, the burning of the books probably did little more than symbolically burn a few copies of the Confucian books conveniently at hand in the capital," really needs to be backed up with something to show its value or removed completely. If this is the case, then the difficulty (and even the necessity) of the work done by Liu Xiang and Liu Xin to recompile all the books that had been damaged is compromised. 202.119.55.8 (talk) 08:11, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]