Talk:Android (robot)
![]() | Robotics B‑class High‑importance | |||||||||
|
![]() | Science Fiction B‑class Mid‑importance | |||||||||
|
![]() | Transhumanism B‑class Mid‑importance | ||||||||||||||||||
|
1, 2 |
This page has archives. Sections older than 21 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
Removed Google Android statement
I have removed this:
The Google Android system has come to life with an actual Google Android powered robot named Humanoid[1]
It isn't an android so doesn't belong here. Chaosdruid (talk) 21:15, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
Albertus Magnus 1270
"The term first mentioned by Albertus Magnus in 1270" diff a course syllabus that didn't even contain the claim was used as a source for four years. Now gone diff :-/ 24.29.92.243 (talk) 00:59, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
Android
The use of the pagename Android is under discussion, see Talk:Android_(operating_system)#Requested_move. 65.95.13.139 (talk) 02:41, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
Page Compromise
Read the Android article. It seems like someone has edited this page with poor intentions. I fail to see why Justin Beiber has anything to do with Androids. This page needs fixed. Looks like a prank to me, or even an anonymous attack. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Catboydale (talk • contribs) 20:41, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
- Page repaired, thank you. It was vandalised about 1 hour before your post. Danim (talk) 21:44, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
Not that far from a GA
If somebody was to reference the Japan section, at least froma cursory look at reference density, this could be a GA candidate. Not sure about the comprehensiveness and language, but if somebody is interested, I could help a little. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 01:16, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
Article organization
I strongly object to the real android projects being organized by country. The country where something was built has very little connection to the development of the technology and its progress. A chronological listing probably makes more sense, allowing us to start with Disney's Mr. Lincoln and progress thru time to current experiments, but if someone has better ideas, I'm open to them. D O N D E groovily Talk to me 19:41, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
- I am fine with that, as long as you are willing to do the job and reorganize the article - go ahead! --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 20:40, 7 December 2011 (UTC)