Talk:GSS coding system

UK geography Start‑class Mid‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics of the United Kingdom Start‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Luton

Erm. Why exactly is Luton listed under Cambridgeshire? Lozleader 18:41, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I was aiming for Huntingdonshire and missed! There are also a bunch of obselete codes in the 56 and upwards range for the 1974-1996 welsh principal areas that I may add. Morwen - Talk 18:43, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Two-tier counties & districts

Would it be worth expanding:

01-07   obsolete, were Greater London & the metropolitan counties

For completeness (and also to assist with anyone researching how the coding system worked prior to the last lot of reorganisation) -- Ratarsed 13:16, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Super Output Areas

It is a good concept, but why this strange name of "Super Output Areas"? – Kaihsu (talk) 22:12, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The article confuses terms. There are lots of Output Areas in England, with, as they say, about 100 households in each. These are then combined to create Lower layer Super Output Areas (often referred to as LSOAs), and there are about 6 OAs in each LSOA. Then Middle layer Super Output Areas (MSOAs) are created by combining about 4 LSOAs. So I guess 'super' basically means combined/bigger.

The later Super Output Section looks OK, but the first section has a one sentence paragraph which is incorrect (OAs don't = SOAs, plus there are 32,482 LSOAs, and and a lot more OAs (I'm not sure how many)) and need changing to reflect this. – C.Heward (talk • contribs) 16:36, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Update with new-style codes

I have created a sortable Wikitable with the new versions of ONS codes (except N. Ireland where the system has not been adopted). To the extent that the ONS codes are used within Wikipedia templates etc, I expect this will continue to be based on the 'old' codes as they are more user friendly, but time will tell. I intend to improve the table when I have some more time, including changing the order of the rows. Any comments welcome. Sussexonian (talk) 11:03, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Query

In the table under "List of current codes" there is a notes column with "NB 1" and "NB 2" but there is no note to indicate what these mean. Keith D (talk) 23:53, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]