Talk:Comparison of project management software/Archive 2

Archive 1

Archive 2

Merge discussion

I have proposed Open source project management software be merged here. As things stand, it is a fork of this article, and serves no purpose since the license column in this article can be easily sorted. More worryingly, each article's content seems to have been updated separately. Lmatt (talk) 02:45, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

The former now includes details on Open Source licenses and hence more informative, but it would be nice to see the same info available here. --techtonik (talk) 05:25, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

As you can see, I added a new table for getting general information and features separated and thus the merge is completed. No information was lost. I think we should get references for every information. I will try to work on these in the next few days hopefully. mabdul 21:37, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

Proposed changes/addition

{{request edit}}

The General Information section should be updated to say that Project KickStart is hosted on-premise and it is not SaaS. The Features section has incorrect information on Project KickStart; it does feature a workflow system, document management, and reporting and analyses.

Webplanner has been on the market since August 2, 2011, and would be a good addition to this chart. General Information for Webplanner: Web-based, not hosted on-premise, SaaS, proprietary. Webplanner Features: Collaborative, scheduling, resource management, workflow system, document management. "No" for the others.

Independent sites that mention Webplanner: San Francisco Chronicle Makeuseof Killerstartups Smashingapps PM4Girls The PMO Podcast Women 2.0 Reorg.co

Disclosure: I work for Experience in Software, makers of Project KickStart and Webplanner. Given the potential conflict of interest, I am following the advice here: WP:SCOIC

Webplanner (talk) 23:44, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

 Not done re Webplanner, I will make the suggested changed regarding KickStart. OSborn ^arf_contribs. 00:43, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

Edit request on 27 April 2012

Add software Project Monitor to the list. Characteristics : General Information Software web-based Hosted on premise SaaS License Project Monitor yes yes yes Proprietary

Features Software Collaborative Issue tracking Scheduling PPM Resource Mgmt Document Mgmt Workflow Reporting Project Monitor yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes

Project Monitor is used by 70 companies, including Orange, JC Decaux, Cartier... As an independent consultant I have personally been involved in the implementation of Project monitor for some of these companies.

Tbocock (talk) 07:54, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

✗ Not done Do you know why this page is protected? Because everybody is adding software without reading the guidelines and big notices above the edit window: Please read WP:WTAF and start writing an article (the best is using the our article wizard). Another problem is, that I started to improve that article so that every fact/claim is cited by a reference, but sadly nobody is following me. mabdul 08:41, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

O Hub

Add software O HUB to the list. Characteristics : General Information

Software web-based Hosted on premise SaaS License O HUB yes yes yes Open source

Features Software - O HUB Issue tracking system - No Scheduling - Yes Project portfolio management - Yes Resource management - Yes Document management system - Yes Workflow - No Reporting - Yes

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Grachiov (talk • contribs) 18:02, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

✗ Not done per WP:WTAF and a section above. mabdul 16:09, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

Edit request on 11 May 2012

Change trac "hosted on-premise" to Yes. It is downloadable from here Jezmpez (talk) 14:13, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

 Done Thanks for improving Wikipedia! mabdul 14:33, 11 May 2012 (UTC)