Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Superscripts and subscripts
![]() | Manual of Style ![]() ![]() | |||||||||
|
Proposed MoS guideline
Note: the content on this page is not something I made up, it's merely a compilation of guidelines from various MoS pages aimed to let the reader get an overview. jonkerz♠ 11:26, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
- Which means it's something somebody else made up.
- It's bad enough having these expressions of prejudice at all, without having a separate page for them, which will evolve separately from the rest of MOS as some Secret Master of Wikipedia takes seizin of it.
- The first sentence is ungrammatical; the rules are largely arbitrary; and anybody who's interested in formating mathematics or music will be looking at WP:MOSMATH and WP:MOSMUSIC anyway.
- Remove the silly general rules here and where you found them; and send the subject sections back to the relevant subjects. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 14:48, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
- I agree. There's no reason for this to exist as a separate page: each paragraph of it belongs somewhere else. A. di M. (talk) 15:12, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
- I see your point, but do not agree with your conclusion. My reasoning for creating this page was because all sup/subscript guidelines are scattered over multiple pages, this page is intended for ease of navigation. If you're interested in how to format music, you go to WP:MOSMUSIC, if you would like to know how to format superscripts you go here. Similar pages include Wikipedia:Manual of Style (abbreviations) and Wikipedia:Manual of Style (capital letters). I guess it's a matter of opinion: some go to WP:MOSMUSIC to figure out how to handle a specific music-related problem, some go there to learn how to format music articles in general. Likewise, this page is will teach how to format sub/superscripts in general. That said, I understand if this is a minority point of view and this page should not be included in the manual. jonkerz♠ 09:41, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
- I agree. There's no reason for this to exist as a separate page: each paragraph of it belongs somewhere else. A. di M. (talk) 15:12, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
If this page to be used, it should itself be made MOS-compliant with regards to the accessibility guidelines, namely WP:COLOR - the "correctness" of some of the examples is indicated by colour alone, and note that coloured text should really only be used if there's a pressing reason to do so. Knepflerle (talk) 16:35, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
- If you were refering to the comparison in the lead, it's now fixed. jonkerz♠ 09:45, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
CSS formatting to emulate Unicode superscripts
It is possible to approximately emulate Unicode numerical superscripts using CSS style statements. As an example, here is the normal HTML superscript:
- Pi3 Orionis
Using <sup style="vertical-align: 0.5em; font-size: 0.6em;">, I get this:
- Pi3 Orionis
Compare to the Unicode character usage:
- Pi³ Orionis
For titles, I needed to add "font-weight: bold;" to the style statement in order to get the correct font weight. But it does work correctly in a {{DISPLAYTITLE}} template.
Regards, RJH (talk) 16:22, 10 July 2012 (UTC)