Talk:Advanced Audio Coding
Appearance
![]() | Computing Start‑class Mid‑importance | |||||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 180 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 1 section is present. |
Article in present tense
Much of the article was written in the present tense. This will either look foolish in ten years, or else it will be re-written. This is somewhat thoughtless. Why leave a mess on Wikipedia? "Windows 3.1 is Microsoft's premier cutting edge etc." Write the date of standards adoption, or industry dominance, in at least a rudimentary historical form. Then it will stand the test of time. Mydogtrouble (talk) 21:42, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
Gapless?
It would be very interesting to know if AAC allows for gapless encoding (without gaps between songs) and if the most popular software and hardware players play such files correctly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.49.51.136 (talk) 09:08, 29 March 2012 (UTC)