This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Thibbs(talk | contribs) at 16:14, 26 June 2012(+Wikiproject templates). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.Revision as of 16:14, 26 June 2012 by Thibbs(talk | contribs)(+Wikiproject templates)
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Gambling, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Gambling on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GamblingWikipedia:WikiProject GamblingTemplate:WikiProject GamblingGambling
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game
The nature of this article was never intended to be one of advertising, thinly-veiled or otherwise. It's intention was to be an article detailing an accurate background of the company and how it has progressed over time with relevance to industry competitors, such as Playtech and Microgaming. I have seen articles on these companies but found them to be far too simple and, in my opinion, not comprehensive enough. All of the information is factual, objective and thoroughly researched. Please advise me more specifically in the areas where the article can be improved.ElNino7712:26, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Well, the problem is that all the information in the article comes directly from the company or its employees (presumably, since no sources were cited) and that's not neutral. The best way to fix this is to cite reliable sources such as reviews in business magazines, newspapers, etc. ColourBurst23:37, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
