Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gay for the stay
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Cydebot (talk | contribs) at 12:18, 24 April 2006 (Robot - Removing extraneous links to old VfD templates.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.Revision as of 12:18, 24 April 2006 by Cydebot (talk | contribs) (Robot - Removing extraneous links to old VfD templates.)
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was transwiki to wiktionary. Tony Sidaway|Talk 19:08, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was transwiki to wiktionary. Tony Sidaway|Talk 19:08, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Delete. It's a phrase that does exist admittedly, but it has no educational offering to Wikipedia. Wikipedia isn't a phrase book.RSieradzki 13:10, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Move to wiktionary minus the Heidi Fless quote --DDerby 14:20, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Keep or wiktionary. I have heard of this term before. Megan1967 04:18, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Move to wiktionary. Sholtar 04:21, Apr 10, 2005 (UTC)
- This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.