Talk:Banker's algorithm
Appearance
See also is for irrelevant resources (?) OK, can be. But for relevant as well? (Primarily for relevant) --Premil 14:59, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
- Definitely. I missed an extra 'also' in my edit comment. Mark Hurd 15:38, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
Banker's rounding link
What does the Banker's rounding link have to do with deadlock avoidance?
This entire article looks suspiciously similar to the explaination of Banker's algorithm in "Operating System Concepts" by Silberschatz, Galvin, and Gagne (pages 259-261 of the 7th edition). Everything from the structure of the article to most of the wording, with a few changes, is no different from this copyrighted work. I'm assuming this shouldn't be?