Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/System of Systems Integration
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Jenks24 (talk | contribs) at 22:44, 7 June 2012 (closing discussion; result was delete). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.Revision as of 22:44, 7 June 2012 by Jenks24 (talk | contribs) (closing discussion; result was delete)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jenks24 (talk) 22:44, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- System of Systems Integration (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Network Integration Evaluation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable US Army bureaucratic procedures with no third party references. Article creator removed {{proposed deletion}} tags on both with no rationales or article improvement. Dori ☾Talk ⁘ Contribs☽ 04:27, 31 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Dori ☾Talk ⁘ Contribs☽ 04:37, 31 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: it appears to be a cut and paste copy (down to the typo in "fi elding") of http://www.bctmod.army.mil/SoSI/sosi.html. As it's US army stuff perhaps not copyvio (I leave that to a US copyright expert), but certainly plagiarism. PamD 07:19, 31 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- certainly plagiarism, but unquestionably US-PD, or I would have speedy deleted it. I think I might support a new rule that a copy of substantial paraphrase of a n official page about an organization is evidence of promotionalism sufficient for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 08:03, 31 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment This is not a process, rather, it's a directorate within the US Army command chain. The problem is that it's just one piece within the labyrinthine acquisition process within the US DoD, so it's difficult to determine its notabilty. Roodog2k (talk) 13:13, 31 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not noteworthy. Intothatdarkness (talk) 14:16, 31 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, no indication of notability. Preparing a big chicken dinner for this guy. Daniel Case (talk) 14:32, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.