Jump to content

Talk:Thalmann algorithm

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Pbsouthwood (talk | contribs) at 20:18, 1 June 2012 (upgrade class). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
WikiProject iconUnderwater diving Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is part of WikiProject Underwater diving, an effort to create, expand, organize, and improve Underwater diving-related articles to a feature-quality standard, and to comprehensively cover the topic with quality encyclopedic articles.Underwater divingWikipedia:WikiProject Underwater divingTemplate:WikiProject Underwater divingUnderwater diving
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Content

This article has a wealth of sources and a dearth of content. Can it be fleshed-out into at least a start-class article? --RexxS (talk) 16:50, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Peter (Southwood) (talk): 20:18, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

B class checklist

1 The article is suitably referenced, with inline citations where necessary. - It has reliable sources, no controversial material, solidly referenced.

2 The article reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies. - It contains basic description, some sections may need expansion, and some less important topics are missing. Unsure how much more would be needed.

3 The article has a defined structure. - Content is organized into groups of related material, including a lead section but could probably be expanded with more sections.

4 The article is reasonably well-written. - The prose contains no major grammatical errors and flows sensibly. The Manual of Style has been followed fairly closely.

5 The article contains supporting materials where appropriate. - There is not much scope for illustration. The most useful diagram is present.

6 The article presents its content in an appropriately understandable way. - The article assumes some technical background in the field. Technical terms are used without much explanation.

Article clearly does not meet B-class criteria, but probably makes it for C.

Comment requested. Peter (Southwood) (talk): 20:18, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Thalmann_algorithm&oldid=495514517"