Main page

Talk page

Submissions
Category, Sorting, Feed

Showcase

Participants
Apply, By subject

Reviewing instructions

Help desk

Backlog
drives

Shortcuts

Welcome to the Articles for Creation help desk

This page is only for questions about article submissions—are you in the right place?
- For questions on how to use or edit Wikipedia, visit the Teahouse.
- For unrelated questions, use the search box or the reference desk.
- Create a draft via Article wizard or request an article at requested articles.
Do not provide your email address or other contact details. Answers will be provided on this page.
Watch out for scammers! If someone contacts you saying that they can get your draft published for payment, they are trying to scam you. Report such attempts here.

Ask a new question
Please check back often for answers.

Skip to today's questions · Skip to the bottom · Archived discussions

Top of page
Table of Contents
Today's posts
Bottom of page

May 4

Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Bernardo Ibáñez Águila

I am curious as to why me translating a Spanish Language article from http://es.wikipedia.org, into English is not an adequate. This Spanish Language website can be accessed via http://www.wikipedia.org/, which is where http://en.wikipedia.org is located. Does http://es.wikipedia.org not share the same probity in its soucres as that of http://en.wikipedia.org? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.132.176.143 (talk) 08:33, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Spanish and English Wikipedia are two different projects with different standards. Anyways, the article needs references to prove notability. See referencing for beginners. A412 (Talk • C) 13:56, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Safe Machine

Hello,

Could you please let me know why the actual references are not enough and let me know what you do expect me to do in order to have proper references? Thank you.

Best regards,

Cedric. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cedric71 (talk • contribs) 12:55, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The references are not enough to prove notability- see the golden rule. To prove notability, the article needs sources that are independent- i.e. not from the company itself, and that discuss it in detail- i.e. not Alexa. While these can be used to reference material, they do not add up to notability. A412 (Talk • C) 13:59, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

New article on Libertarian Paternalism 2

Hi,

I recently posted a question here but feel it was not answered. I optimistically give it another try! Here is the question:

"Hi, I recently created a new article/entry on Libertarian Paternalism. I have written a PhD thesis on related stuff and currently lead a research project on libertarian paternalism in particular financed by the EU commission. In brief, I am an expert on this. The review of my article said I should withdraw it and instead improve on the article on Soft Paternalism. However, though "soft paternalism" is sometimes used to refer to Libertarian Paternalism, this is very much a minority practice. Soft paternalism has two main uses, one of which has some overlap with Libertarian Paternalism. I have edited the entry on Paternalism to reflect this fact. Ideally, what should happen is for the article on Soft paternalism to be removed, as this concept is now treated in the entry on Paternalism. Also, the existing entry on Soft Paternalism as I said reflect a minority view. The definition cited at the beginning of the article refers to an article in The Economist, hardly a very authoritative source in this context."

I also added this piece of information for context:

"I explained all this to my reviewer (User:Tom Morris) on his talk page but it seems he choose to simply delete my questions and suggestions. In any case they are no longer on his talk page and there is nothing on my talk page to explain what may have happened.

Please advice. I am rather new to editing Wikipedia but believe I could do some good if I just get over these stumbling blocks. Thank you. Filofil (talk) 14:31, 14 April 2012 (UTC)"

Below is the answer I got. It notes that part of the new entry on Libertarian Paternalism is more or less copied from the text in the Soft Paternalism entry. I don't see why this is a problem, and it is anyway not related to my question. I know there is an entry on Soft Paternalism that partly deals with Libertarian Paternalism. For example the copied section, that is why I copied it. However, the name of this entry is misleading, the entry is neither about Soft Paternalism as this phrase is most typically understood, nor on Libertarian Paternalism. I hope you can see the problem here? I'm just trying to provide a solution but feel a bit frustrated that it is being opposed for reasons I fail to see. (Psychologically speaking this tends to make me feel like an outsider having stumbled into a world of people rather protective of "their" bits of text and of "the way we usually do things around here". But I try to tell myself this is just my subjective impression caused by anxiety in the face of this system and community that I don't yet understand.)

The only thing DCS says in relation to my question is that since the two entries have one section of text in common they cannot be different enough to deal with two different things. This is obviously just a logical mistake (the sequence 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and the sequence 1, 2, 3, 5 contain many of the same elements but one is the start of the sequence of natural numbers, the other the start of the sequence of prime numbers (and these two things should have two separate entries, as they do)).

It would also be interesting to learn more about norms regarding the attribution of text sections to wiki authors when text is moved, in relation to DCS:s comment, but this is not my main concern.

"Filofil,

There are no secrets on the Wiki and there is a record of everything. I have reviewed the comments from User:Tom Morris and I have to agree with the him. But I find even more of a problem, your example is almost a word for word duplicate of the example from Soft paternalism.

Consider the default contribution rates on defined contribution tax-deferred retirement savings plans in the United States. Until recently, the default contribution rate for most plans was zero, and despite the enormous tax advantages, many people took years to start contributing if they ever did. Behavioral economists attribute this to the "status quo bias", the common human resistance to changing one's behavior, combined with another common problem: the tendency to procrastinate. Research by behavioral economists demonstrated, moreover, that firms which raised the default rate instantly and dramatically raised the contribution rates of their employees.
— Your article

As an example, take the default contribution rates on defined contribution tax-deferred retirement savings plans in the United States. Until recently, the default contribution rate for most plans was zero, and despite the enormous tax advantages, many people took years to start contributing if they ever did. Behavioral economists attribute this to the "status quo bias", the common human resistance to changing one's behavior, combined with another common problem: the tendency to procrastinate. Research by behavioral economists demonstrated, moreover, that firms which raised the default rate instantly and dramatically raised the contribution rates of their employees.
— Soft paternalism

I'm not suggesting that you copied from that article, each article cites a different reference. But, if both articles cite exactly the same example, I can't see that there could be enough difference between the two that there needs to be a separate article. I suggest talking with the people here, Portal:Libertarianism, before you resubmit your article. :- ) DCS 05:09, 15 April 2012 (UTC)"[reply]

I will try to follow up on the suggestion to talk to Portal:Libertarianism, though libertarians typically (and correctly) think that Libertarian Paternalism is not a form of libertarianism.

Filofil (talk) 16:42, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ismailkhanpet

i created a post "ISMAILKHANPET" in wikipedia few days ago and you people denied it, i don't know the reason why you did this. ISMAILKHANPET is a village which has Famous temple located — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.82.243.101 (talk) 20:58, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like the reason was clearly indicated by the reviewer and clarification was provided via the link provided. Independent and reliable sources that provide coverage of the village are required to establish its notability; the only source provided thus far is not independent and arguably provides no coverage. Dalisays (talk) 04:21, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

May 5

We need bibles in thai for evangelism, urgent

we need bibles in Thai for evangelism, urgente for bring person from Thailand to Jesus — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.167.3.194 (talk) 06:57, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What if they want to stay in Thailand? joe•roe^t•c 20:19, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am that I Siam? 66.102.83.61 (talk) 16:43, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

lol! On a more serious note: I'm afraid we can't help you. Wikipedia's policy on neutrality forbids us to assist you in the conversion of Buddhists to Christians... as does the policy on common sense! Pol430 talk to me 23:15, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/D' Anton Lynn

Is this good to go through? 71.180.203.153 (talk) 20:01, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps I don't understand American football well enough (I don't understand it at all to be honest), but how can someone be signed to the New York Jets and remain 'undrafted'? Pol430 talk to me 23:17, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Donald Scavarda ONCE Composer

The other ONCE Composers have a separate articles in Wikipedia. You will find separate articles on ONCE Composers Gordon Mumma, Roger Reynolds and Robert Ashley. The only major ONCE Composer without a separate article focusing on his work his Donald Scavarda. I believe that Donald Scavarda deserves his own listing just as the other composers.

I would like to request to have someone re-consider this matter. The other ONCE composers are very supportive of the idea that Donald Scavarda have an entry in Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mchard12 (talk • contribs) 22:18, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What the ONCE composers want is largely irrelevant, wether this submission complies with policy is expressly relevant. I can't make an accurate assessment of the subject's notability because the references are all over the place. See WP:REFB for help with references. This notwithstanding, the submission is not written from a neutral point of view. If you reformat the references properly and fundamentally re-write the submission to comply with the policy on neutrality, then it may be accepted. Pol430 talk to me 23:36, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

May 6

Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Off the wall studio

how do i upload a few pics on this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jessejameskid (talk • contribs) 14:50, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You might want to take a look at Wikipedia:Files for upload, although there are severe limits on what copyright Wikipedia will accept on an image. If you can find an image on-line with a license that allows its modification and commercial re-use, such as Creative Commons CC-BY or CC-BY-SA, you can ask for it to be uploaded. The requirement is for a very permissive license (for instance, a user who uploaded a photo of a local Boy Scout troop for the Boy Scout article here might then find the same photo re-used on some other site eroticising spanking, with the whole mess surrounded with advertisements for commercical sponsors) so only a small minority of photographers release their material under such terms.

It is possible to use the "advanced search" on Flicker and search for "creative commons, permitting commercial use, images to modify and build upon" although these tend to be a minority of even the Creative Commons images on that site (most have restrictions, such as non-commercial use only, reuse with no modifications or are simply copyrighted so that you can't use them). You might also want to see commons.wikimedia.org to see if we already have anything here which fits. Most often, if you're looking for one specific landmark, it's a question of blind luck to find (or not find) an existing image. Sometimes one is available, sometimes.

I would also strongly advise that you try to find some reliable sources as references supporting your text, such as descriptions of your article's subject in books or news bulletins. The subject's own self-description is not reliable due to potential conflict of interest and sites like Facebook and YouTube tend not to be reliable (with rare exceptions, such as a TV station posting its news crew's footage on such a site after broadcast). 66.102.83.61 (talk) 16:26, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/John's Modern Cabins

One question about two printed paid-circulation magazines, "Route 66 Magazine" (quarterly) and "Rural Missouri"; I'd cited them and had a piece rejected for this on WP:RS grounds. Is there a specific issue with articles in these two publications as sources? They're not the sole sources for the article, but if they are valid then removing them would likely only weaken the article as one (Emily Priddy, Ron Warnick: Route 66 Magazine, 2002) did play a key role in a "Friends of the Mother Road" campaign by US66 preservationists to convince the current owners to abandon a demolition proposal for the site. 66.102.83.61 (talk) 16:26, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree with the declining reviewer in this respect. I think both of those publications are very good sources, and the article itself looks great. Please follow the directions to resubmit the article and I will publish it shortly. Thanks, Nathan2055 ^talk 22:56, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Community Integration

Re: Wikipedia talk: Articles for Creation/Community Integration I've just submitted a final copy of the encyclopedic entry (community integration) together with 98 footnotes. However, the body/text of the article will not show on the screen or print for me. Your assistance would be appreciated. It will only allow printing of the references, contents and principles. Thank you for your assistance. I do need a copy for my own work; it allowed printing two days ago on March 4th, but not any additions since that time (e.g., employment integration). JARacino (talk) 18:05, 6 May 2012 (UTC) JARacino[reply]

I look at community integration and the "print preview" appears to be a full ten-page document. Any chance that your web browser still has an old version in memory? 66.102.83.61 (talk) 20:17, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It looks fine to me as well. Perhaps you could clear your cache and try again? Thanks, Nathan2055 ^talk 23:03, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks...there is a great copy on as wikipedia, community integration (created article)...Yea, I am excited! It was accepted! The version on my contributions list is still not printable (I'll check the browser and copies). thanks for your help. JARacino (talk) 05:39, 7 May 2012 (UTC)JARacino[reply]

Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Plus formerly know as 18 Plus

I have tried to submit an artical about 18 plus/eighteen plus. Can someone explain where i am going wrong? Thanks SouthernArea (talk) 19:02, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Most or all of your cited information comes from the group itself (plusgroups.org.uk, southern-area-plusgroups.org.uk) and not from neutral, reliable outside sources? That's usually problematic as it makes the resulting article look like an advertisement. 66.102.83.61 (talk) 20:21, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, most of those sources are either from the group's website or a book published by the group. Find third party sources such as news articles that conform to WP:V and WP:MINREF (the two minimum required citation policies) and then follow the instructions to resubmit your article. Thanks, Nathan2055 ^talk 22:53, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

May 7

Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/DeAngelo Peterson

Is it good? 71.180.203.153 (talk) 01:33, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:NGRIDIRON they actually have to play in a proffesional game for them to meet the notability requirements. So... no, it's not good to go. Pol430 talk to me 09:59, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

They have to play in the game but what about if there are in the practice squad at least? 71.180.203.153 (talk) 18:40, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Garrett Celek

I put some sources on to the article. It's good? 71.180.203.153 (talk) 01:33, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:NGRIDIRON they actually have to play in a proffesional game for them to meet the notability requirements. Also, this submission contains copyrighted text from http://www.msuspartans.com/sports/m-footbl/mtt/celek_garrett00.html Pol430 talk to me 10:02, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

They have to play in the game but what about if there are in the practice squad at least? 71.180.203.153 (talk) 18:44, 7 May 2012 (UTC) Well I erase it all then. 71.180.203.153 (talk) 18:44, 7 May 2012 (UTC) I was trying to find information so it would not be false information. 71.180.203.153 (talk) 18:44, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Brian Linthicum

I added some sources here too. So you can review it. 71.180.203.153 (talk) 01:34, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

As above. Pol430 talk to me 10:03, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/RDC CONCRETE INDIA (PVT) LTD.

Caption1
Caption2

You seem to like adding example galleries to things...

Declined submission is unreferenced, so has nothing to allow us to establish notability. It's also little more than WP:ARTSPAM. Pol430 talk to me 10:08, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Browsermmorpg.com

Hello, there are no independent sources to cite this article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Browsermmorpg.com. Is there no way to put this article on the site? It is not a very big site, but it has been doing well and it has been launched in 2008. Since it is a relatively small site from Romania, there are no major sources of information about it.

Unfortunately, if there are no independent, reliable sources about Browsermmorpg.com, it is not important enough to have an article on Wikipedia. Sionk (talk) 21:25, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Review of Wikipedia talk:Article wizard

a notable personality of chiniot sheikh baradery is parvez sadiq who won all pakistan quiz competitions twice ikhencluding a car from popular quiz show neelam ghar he passed his matriculation from islamia high school chiniot in 1973. he is serving as customs intelligence officer at karachi . he secured brain of pakistan and brain of karachi titles,khurram aftab.^[1] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 175.110.249.249 (talk) 22:15, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This page is for questions about the Articles for creation process. If you would like to start writing a new article, please use the Article wizard. If you have an idea for a new article, but would like to request that someone else write it, please see: Wikipedia:Requested articles. I hope this helps. Pol430 talk to me 20:26, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

May 8

Review of Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Jon Charles Altman

Resolved

Pol430 talk to me 20:27, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Where's everything I've written. My article has been reduced down to a single sentence. Elisabeth Yarbakhsh (talk) 01:11, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You also posted to Wikipedia:Help desk#Article cropped where it has been answered. The ref tags were misformatted. It has been fixed. PrimeHunter (talk) 02:58, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Nullspeeds in General Relativity

<redacted> — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.42.57.208 (talk)

err, no personal attacks or ranting please. You have been dealt with in a civil manner, please remain civil with others. Pol430 talk to me 20:31, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sam Kwang Elementary

Hi, My school asked me to create a page for their Elementary School

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sam Kwang Elementary

My article was denied. I will attempt to fix the referencing. I was wondering if the school website would be enough to validate it. I'm not exactly certain what other sources I need to supply.

Any help would be greatly appreciated. Sorry to bother you with my inexperience. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jessecpence (talk • contribs) 06:14, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No, that would not be a good source. I also don't recommened you writing this article per reasons listed here. Reply if you have any questions. Thanks, Nathan2055 ^talk 20:34, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Elementary schools are almost never considered notable, unless they pass the general notability guideline (it does not appear that your school does). If a submission is not notable, it cannot be accepted. See WP:VRS for more info on how notability is assessed. Pol430 talk to me 20:36, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Revel consulting

To whom this may concern,

I desperately need some advice. I am currently a student at the University of Washington, and as part of a class project we need to create a Wikipedia page for a local business. I have been trying to make a Wikipedia entry for Revel Consulting for about 3 months now. I constantly change the copy, formatting, references, and everything in between, yet my submissions are continuously denied. I have even tried modeling my entry after similar companies, despite their extremely simplistic and minamilastic provided information (for example Caiman_Consulting & Slalom_Consulting). I am truly stuck and I could really utilize more specific advice on how to get my entry approved; it has been denied and re-denied for a vast array of reasons, although it appears the same as already-existing pages. Please shed some advice, as my grade in my class depends on it, and the project's due date is rapidly approaching.

Thank you very much for your time and help,

Jason May jasonmay2@gmail.com Mynameisjmay33 (talk) 22:15, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Local businesses are awkward to create as articles as it's very easy for the finished page to end up looking like an advertisement - something that the business itself (or its owners) might have written to only say good things about their company or its products. It's also not easy to show that something that only exists locally is important enough to have an article in an encyclopaedia read worldwide. Many local companies aren't important enough to be in Wikipedia at all.

The only way to try to write something like this is to look at this as if you knew nothing about the business, other than name, location and the most basic identifiers and were yourself trying to find the info in order to explain the topic. What can you find out that's reliable? Maybe there was an article about them in a newspaper, maybe they were mentioned in a book or in broadcast media. Go search online, find what reliable and neutral sources are saying about your intended subject, be prepared to abandon your topic as non-notable if they have nothing good or bad to say at all. If you find sources, summarise their information and site where you found the information. Don't insert your own personal observations, whether fact or opinion. Don't write a page just to say "I think XYZ company is so great" (or so awful); the former looks like an ad, the latter lacks neutrality.

Certainly there are existing pages which are problematic, we tend to tag them with {{advertisement}} to ask they be cleaned up or sometimes even delete them. That's no reason to create more pages which are merely cheerleading or promoting a firm instead of taking a neutral, objective and non first-person look at them to see if they're notable and give a balanced view of any notable good or bad things they've produced. 66.102.83.61 (talk) 00:34, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Tell your tutor that local businesses are usually not notable enough to be on the mainspace, and keep that in mind next time they plan a project like this. At the meantime however, you can move the whole page onto your own space (as a subpage). In that case, you can have a page on Wikipedia, thus satisfy your assignment criteria. Kinkreet^{~♥moshi moshi♥~} 11:59, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jack Perry

Hello,

This article has been stuck in second review for several days. The first review happened in a matter of hours. Is it still awaiting review or was there an erro when it was submitted the second time?

Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.61.157.220 (talk) 22:52, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The current backlog is eight days (there are submissions from April 30 still waiting for a reviewer to get to them). Your article is still awaiting review, with 450 others ahead of you. 66.102.83.61 (talk) 00:42, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Accepted Pol430 talk to me 20:35, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

May 9

How come you report how many Muslims are in the world and not Christians???184.9.151.177 (talk) 03:41, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

You report 1.6 billion Muslims in the world. I had to visit another page to find out how many Christians are in the world. The site I visited said there were 2.18 billion Christians in the world. I always refer other people to Wikipedia for answers. I am at a loss as to this ommission at Wikipedia, unless I'm not asking the question correctly. Thanks for your wonderful site. I use it all the time. Jo Ellen

We do. It's at the bottom of the opening section in Christianity. Someguy1221 (talk) 04:07, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/South African Legion of Military Veterans

Could you please explain why the article is not "sufficiently notable", after all, being both a founder member of an international organisation and the oldest such organisation in South Africa, surely that is notable enough? As to their being sufficient notation, could you give an example of what would suffice? I have given references to almost every sentence and used recognised historical sources. Please indicate if you insist only on American sources or precisely what is needed?

Sincerelyvitéz 08:51, 9 May 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cavszabo (talk • contribs)

1) Wikipedia cannot be a source. 2) "being both a founder member of an international organisation and the oldest such organisation in South Africa, surely that is notable enough?" Give independent sources which says that. If it is notable, then there will be more than one source on it. 3) Please use a consistent format when citing (I have fixed it now) 4) If it is not notable, it will never make it on Wikipedia, no matter how much you try. We do not insist on anything. 5) I have found some so-so sources, try adding them on. Kinkreet^{~♥moshi moshi♥~} 11:51, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Mass of Universe

What is status of this edit? Is it automatically being rejected? If so how do I correct? Jimjohnson2222 Jimjohnson2222 (talk) 13:05, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It is still waiting a review. Please be patient as there are more than 600 submission ahead of yours in the queue. →B music ian 13:41, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

free advertising

We want to post an article about our company which isn't very noteworthy or groundbreaking. Basically we just want to use Wikipedia as advertising and get out information about our small, insignificant company. How do we do this? What are the loop holes? And are there any examples I can copy? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.131.156.49 (talk) 15:47, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No, you do not get to do this. The end. Someguy1221 (talk) 18:11, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed... submission blanked. Pol430 talk to me 20:21, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Robin del Monte

Extended content

Roberto Enrique del Monte Montoya (Born January 5 ,1988) known artistically as Robin, Is a Cuban Bass player, guitar player, song writer and singer. Born and raised in Santiago de Cuba. He began his primary artistic studies in the Vocational School of Arts in the Specialty of Guitar in the year 1998.

Being in that school, he participated in different concerts and shows in very important institutions of the city. He was also part of the choir of the school during 5 years and was a member of the Guitar Orchestra at the same time. He also participated in guitar and Piano competitions.

In the year 2003, He enters to Music's Conservatory Esteban Salas, in the specialty of Guitar. During those years he was in the choir of camera of the Conservatory and participated in several concerts in the Dolores´s Hall like soloist and accompanying different national and international artists.

He has received several courses, among them: Harmony applied to the guitar imparted by the outstanding guitarist and professor Jorge Triana, Camagüey 2006. Popular Music imparted by professor Mario Pujals, TRES (the instrument) tought by professor Andrés López and La guitarra trovadoresca inside the International festival of Trova Pepe Sánchez in Santiago de Cuba.

In April 2007 he graduated of the Conservatory of Music Esteban Salas with the title of: Instrumentalist, Guitar Professor, Tres and Group Practice.

After graduated he continues being part of the Guitar Orchestra of Santiago de Cuba under the direction of Lleliandra Gonzáles.

In 2007, Robin also worked during a time with the sextet “ Son Cristal”, group that is devoted to interpret the traditional Cuban music, as guitarist and singer.

In December of the Same year he became part of the emblematic and outstanding group from Santiago "Los Kinin" where he is playing bass and he is vocalist too, group with which has shown up in the big scenarios of the city and of the Country.

He has also participated in the International Festival of Caribbean from the 2003 to the 2011 Festival of Guitar of Camagüey 2006. International Festival of Choirs 2001. International festival of the trova. He has played in the concert Homage for the 40 Anniversary of the group “ Los Kinin” and it has shared scenarios with figures and important groupings of the country.

Collaterally to his career as bassist of the group Los Kinin, Robin also performs as bass player, guitarist and singer of the Sabor Tropical´Show with which has shown up for scenarios of Italy taking a wide repertoire of Cuba toward Europe for 3 serial years.

Robin is also well recognized by his “very cool” attitude and development on the scenario that he gets the attention of the whole audience that daily choose the Piano Bar to delight with the music of the kinin.

At the moment he is pawned in the preparation of the next summer tour 2012 in Italy...

Caption1
Caption2

Do you have an actual question? Pol430 talk to me 20:16, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nullspeeds in General Relativity

"Most people would be very happy to have such a comprehensive, individual explanation of a decision." Why do you group me with most people? I am noted as working to further General Relativity.

I see my name is not attached; I am Norman Albers...MY BROTHER is STEVE ALBERS, and I had mentioned his name as having helped gather ref's, but he is a professional meteorologist. Have sold his soul, he asked that his name be removed. TOO BAD. Boyd also got cold feet. This is an ugly experience, at first. This morning, tho, I realized that in offering this physics, I stand alone but shoulder to shoulder with Albert Einstein. This leaves me feeling strong.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Ncutssss (talk • contribs) 18:08, 9 May 2012 (UTC) unsigned not NORMAN ALBERS[reply]

Idea: Use the help desk when you need help. Oh sorry, maybe you do, but of a different kind. (o,..,o) Kinkreet^{~♥moshi moshi♥~} 21:20, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Article for creation Dennis Moody

I received a message stating this article no longer had copyright issues, but needed references. These have been included. What is the current status of this article?

Jamesmulder (talk) 20:37, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

??

Can I read more about Nullspeeds in GR? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.56.22.106 (talk) 21:17, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please clarify your question. Kinkreet^{~♥moshi moshi♥~} 21:15, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

May 10

Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sara Niemietz discography

Hello,

I think I may have landed in AfC by mistake. I've been working improving the Sara Niemietz article for about a month. I created Sara Niemietz discography in the Draft section and used the "publish your article" link to arrive here.

After reading up on AfC, I find that there is a backlog of articles and that AfC is meant for those who wish to post anonymously/or don't have enough edits to move the article. Considering the backlog, should I remove the AfC template and move the draft into article space myself?

This will be my first new article, I believe I have decent references and category templates.

Regards, Steve 009o9 (talk) 04:12, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that would be grand. Also, if you can improve on your layout and formatting to suit Wikipedia guidelines, that'd be even better (see WP:LAY). Thanks. Kinkreet^{~♥moshi moshi♥~} 21:12, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Is the article reviewed?

I recently created an article on Erin Martin: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erin_Martin

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Erin_Martin

I searched for Erin Martin and found no result so I created the article. Now that I've submitted it, I got a warning that a page with the title exists. But when I search for Erin Martin, I redirect to my article of Erin Martin.

So I need confirmation on my article, is there really another article exists with the title of Erin Martin? Or the article meant is actually my article? And is my article reviewed?

Zarryfaz (talk) 04:37, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It means your article. Normally, editors will move the page to the mainspace. I have requested deletion of your AfC page. Good contribution. Kinkreet^{~♥moshi moshi♥~} 21:07, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Renaming an AfC

How do I delete the AfC Wikipedia talk:Articles for Creation/Alcohol (Race Horse) which I've renamed for consistency with other similar articles to Wikipedia talk:Articles for Creation/Alcohol (Horse) ??

150.101.79.26 (talk) 05:59, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Both pages are non-existent. But I know what you mean, it's already been requested, there's nothing to do now. For future reference. Either blank the page (delete everything on the page) or request for speedy deletion. Kinkreet^{~♥moshi moshi♥~} 21:02, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

request for article

Wikipedia talk:rights and duties of a student 110.172.141.53 (talk) 07:49, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please click here and follow the instructions. Kinkreet^{~♥moshi moshi♥~} 20:35, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Trongos

Hi, I am the process of creating a listing for my invention the Trongos, a newly invented musical instrument. Upon review I was informed that I did not have enough resources. My question is: since this is a new invention and I am the inventor, how am I supposed to get resources on something that is so new? Will uploading photos help? Should I list my web page that has information about the Trongos? Richard — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.89.169.169 (talk) 11:29, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Before anything, you have to show your subject (Trongos in your case) is notable. If you can find any newspaper or notable websites that interviewed you about your instrument, or anything else that proves to us that it is notable. See WP:notability for guidance. Please understand we cannot put everything on Wikipedia; there are millions of people inventing many million of things, they invention must be notable for inclusion here. Hope you can understand. Kinkreet^{~♥moshi moshi♥~} 20:40, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

help please

How do i prepose a article to cover the poem "A Wreath for Emmett Till?" — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.241.57.126 (talk) 17:02, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You may request articles to be created here Kinkreet^{~♥moshi moshi♥~} 20:59, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Submission

How do I submit this article for review? I want to get it posted. Please be specific, as I find working with wikipedia confusing.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/White_Nelson_Diehl_Evans_LLP Jgraves65 (talk) 17:41, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done Kinkreet^{~♥moshi moshi♥~} 20:48, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WARWICK EVANS DESIGNER

Hi New to all this. I have made THREE requests for clarification. My article about the Cambridge industrial designer has been knocked back due to lack of references. But, it has over a dozen references. I have asked for clarification on this point, but answer comes there none.

Could somebody just send me a simple link to where you would like the references put, please?

Thank you Jhoward2003

Jhoward2003 (talk) 18:54, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It is not the quality of your source that is the problem, it is the fact that either we will never be able to find the source and so it is not verifiable, and also because you didn't give us any links to anything specific - i.e. an article about the topic. A lot of topics are covered in the http://www.designcouncil.org.uk website, it's not all on Warwick Evans Designer. Be more specific. Find sources that people can actually look up. Those are the two points of improvement. Kinkreet^{~♥moshi moshi♥~} 20:53, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Phoenix Stone

I need help creating an article for Phoenix Stone. What kind of sources can I submit?

Socialjas (talk) 20:05, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Anything notable, verifiable and reliable. See WP:V Kinkreet^{~♥moshi moshi♥~} 20:58, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Jonathan Erickson Eisley

Question, How do you create a listing for this person, Jonathan Erickson Eisley. He is all over google, IMDB, been an actor for years, his brother David Glen Eisley is on Wiki, his sister in Law, Olivia Hussey is up on Wiki, his niece India Eisley is up here and his father, Anthony Eisley is listed, they are all actors that are known and yet Wikipedia cannot seem to verify any information on Jonathan Erickson Eisley who has been working as an actor and has over 64 credits on the IMDB alone. What is the secret to creating a page for this guy? Please let me know, because the last reviewer declined to open a page up after their review. Thank you, Just google his name and see. Best, A — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aypoliakin (talk • contribs) 20:16, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It is not about the subject, it is also about how the article is written. Improve on your article by improving references, expanding the article body, and if you can't be bothered, simply request it so someone else can (MAY) write it for you (see WP:RA) Kinkreet^{~♥moshi moshi♥~} 20:58, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/List of Crayola marker colors

I'm a little new here an I created the page 'List of crayola marker colors'. I don't really understand what I did wrong. Can I have some help? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kmkearney (talk • contribs) 21:01, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/AN TEEN WITH AN DREAM

an teen with an dream is tanasia stephens born march 27 1997 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.75.70.7 (talk) 23:39, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

tanasia stephens is an teen with an dream

^ khurram aftab al baradery magazine karachi

[1] urram aftab al baradery magazine karachi

[1]