Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FISh (programming language)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Just Chilling (talk | contribs) at 20:48, 9 May 2012 (+Closed AfD - delete). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.Revision as of 20:48, 9 May 2012 by Just Chilling (talk | contribs) (+Closed AfD - delete)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. No evidence has been adduced of remotely meeting notability requirements. TerriersFan (talk) 20:48, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- FISh (programming language) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I found no reliable sources. SL93 (talk) 23:01, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. All signs point to this being a completely insignificant language. The website looks like it was left for dead over a decade ago. --NINTENDUDE64 01:24, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I found this article, which appears to have been written by the same person that created the website. Interesting, but agreed - old, and apparently left for dead. VeritosNow (talk) 17:56, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:46, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I cannot find reliable sources discussing this programming language. -- Whpq (talk) 16:26, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.