Talk:Web Open Font Format

Typography C‑class High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Typography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Typography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TypographyWikipedia:WikiProject TypographyTemplate:WikiProject TypographyTypography
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

Internet C‑class High‑importance

	Internet portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Computing C‑class High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

And here I thought there would be some discussion. ¦ Reisio (talk) 15:45, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion: Browser support table

A table showing which versions (say, the left axis) of which browsers (say, labeled on the top axis) support WOFF would be helpful and very easy to find and absorb as a reader. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.50.8.11 (talk) 02:03, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

sry, but for what? in the text there is explaining which versions of browsers does support woff! mabdul 11:40, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comparison of layout engines (Web Typography) already has such a table. I'm linking to it from the article.
--Gyrobo (talk) 13:47, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The mention of Internet Explorer 9 should probably be updated now that it's officially released (WOFF support is now in IE9 release vs the mention about the platform preview 3 build). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 132.205.104.121 (talk) 19:36, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Vendor support out-of-date

The text in vendor support is out-of-date. All current versions of desktop browsers now support WOFF, including Internet Explorer and Safari.58.96.101.86 (talk) 23:54, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Updated and removed the template. Please replace my FileHippo.com reference if find more authoritive changelog for Safari. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 17:04, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Worth updating for mobile. The iPhone originally used fonts in SVG only, and then TrueType support was added. Not sure about WOFF. --John Nagle (talk) 20:00, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]