Jump to content

Partition regularity

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by JdH (talk | contribs) at 15:56, 19 April 2006 (References). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Given a set , a collection of subsets is called partition regular if for any , and any finite partition , then for some i ≤ n, contains an element of . Ramsey theory is sometimes characterized as the study of which collections are partition regular.

Examples

  • sets with positive upper density in : the upper density of is defined as .
  • For any ultrafilter on a set , is partition regular. If , then for exactly one is .
  • sets of recurrence: a set R of integers is called a set of recurrence if for any measure preserving transformation of the probability space (Ω, β, μ) and of positive measure there is a nonzero so that .
  • Call a subset of natural numbers a.p.-rich if it contains arbitrarily long arithmetic progressions. Then the collection of a.p.-rich subsets is partition regular (Van der Waerden, 1927).
  • Let be the set of all n-subsets of . Let . For each n, is partition regular. (Ramsey, 1930).
  • Call a subset of natural numbers i.p.-rich if it contains arbitrarily large finite sets together with all their finite sums. Then the collection of i.p.-rich subsets is partition regular (Folkman-Rado-Sanders, 1933).
  • the set of barriers on : call a collection of finite subsets of a barrier if:
    • and
    • for all infinite , there is some such that the elements of X are the smallest elements of I; i.e. and .
This generalizes Ramsey's theorem, as each is a barrier. (Nash-Williams, 1965)
  • IP* sets:
  • central sets; i.e. the members of any minimal idempotent in , the Stone-Čech compactification of the integers.
  • MTk sets for each k, i.e. k-tuples of finite sums (Milliken-Taylor, 1975)

See also


References

  1. V. Bergelson, N. Hindman Partition regular structures contained in large sets are abundant J. Comb. Theory (Series A) 93 (2001), 18-36.
  2. T. Brown, An interesting combinatorial method in the theory of locally finite semigroups, Pacific J. Math. 36, no. 2 (1971), 285–289.
  3. N. Hindman, Finite sums from sequences within cells of a partition of N, J. Combinatorial Theory (Series A) 17 (1974) 1-11.
  4. C.St.J.A. Nash-Williams, On well-quasi-ordering transfinite sequences, Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 61 (1965), 33-39.