Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Advanced Concept Technology Demonstration
- Advanced Concept Technology Demonstration (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not appear to be notable to me. JDDJS (talk) 16:50, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
- Keep Discussed by the Federation of American Scientists here, by the US Government Accountability Office here (though that may be considered a primary source), the RAND Corporation talks about it in one of their publications here. There's not a lot but I think there's enough to scratch passed WP:GNG. Also, I imagine as an offical government "office" or whatever that it should be considered inherently notable (I don't know if policy addresses this). SÆdontalk 21:51, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:41, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:42, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
- Keep needs some examples of programs adding to it. I'll do that. Greglocock (talk) 00:35, 2 May 2012 (UTC)