Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Advanced Concept Technology Demonstration

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to be notable to me. JDDJS (talk) 16:50, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Discussed by the Federation of American Scientists here, by the US Government Accountability Office here (though that may be considered a primary source), the RAND Corporation talks about it in one of their publications here. There's not a lot but I think there's enough to scratch passed WP:GNG. Also, I imagine as an offical government "office" or whatever that it should be considered inherently notable (I don't know if policy addresses this). SÆdon^talk 21:51, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]