Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Software quality model
- Software quality model (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article is of low quality and is covered entirely by Software quality Camjackson89 (talk) 23:56, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Camjackson89 (talk) 23:56, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
- Delete as redundant.Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 00:26, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
- delete Software quality model is a notable and important topic that we ought to cover. However a redlink would be more honest and this article isn't worth the bytes. Andy Dingley (talk) 00:54, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
- Question Would a redlink be better than a redirect? Redirecting this title seems to me to be more helpful than deleting. Nyttend (talk) 01:42, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
- We don't have an appropriate target to redirect it to. A WP:REDLINK indicates that we have a notable topic but don't have an article on it. Andy Dingley (talk) 01:57, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
- Why is it so different from software quality that it needs a separate article? Nyttend (talk) 12:08, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
- We don't have an appropriate target to redirect it to. A WP:REDLINK indicates that we have a notable topic but don't have an article on it. Andy Dingley (talk) 01:57, 25 April 2012 (UTC)