User talk:HTML2011

The old talk page before I found out about deletions of language articles carried out by Kwamikagami is here

Without talking User:Kwamikagami deleted articles that I did create. I want that he gets de-admined. Deleting articles of non-admin users is no little thing - we non-admins cannot see the article content anymore. Also it is unfair to advance ones position in a dispute by using admin rights.

It UGLY, MEAN, ARROGANT TO delete articles in a CONTENT DISPUTE. HTML2011 (talk) 15:34, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello. You have a new message at Maryana (WMF)#Please help me!'s talk page. Maryana (WMF) (talk) 17:01, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

April 2012

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:07, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

For which edits am I blocked? HTML2011 (talk) 14:16, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

For which edits am I blocked? HTML2011 (talk) 14:48, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I want to know for which edits am I blocked. HTML2011 (talk) 15:14, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I want to know for which edits am I blocked. HTML2011 (talk) 15:27, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I want to know for which edits am I blocked. HTML2011 (talk) 15:35, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

HTML2011 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Neither the block nor the admin that installed it provide a link to the "edit war" that User:Boing! said Zebedee proclaimed. In absence of such a link or links, I don't know what I am blocked for. In absence of knowing what I am blocked for I would like the block being lifted OR the links provided.

Decline reason:

You have been told repeatedly, for instance by Dennis Brown in this message. Favonian (talk) 15:47, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Admins, please feel free to browse the history of this talk page for the three times the information he requested was provided. Dennis Brown ® © 15:42, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

HTML2011 if you do not understand what Dennis Brown has been telling you after each of your requests above, the answer is not to delete his answer and ask again. The way to handle that is to explain what you don't understand and engage in a conversation. Just continuing to ask the exact same question does not accomplish anything. GB fan 16:02, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]