Talk:Component-based Scalable Logical Architecture
![]() | Computing: Software Unassessed | ||||||||||||
|
This article would be improved by adding a Criticisms, and Success Stories sections so potential adoptees could get an idea what solutions CLSA is ideal for, and what projects might be complicated by CSLA. Also a discussion of how CSLA can be enhanced with object relational mapping technologies and code generation would be useful.
The article is an ad for the software, it needs to be rewritten
I'm willing to bet whoever wrote the majority of the article has a vested interest in the success of CSLA, the article is practically sales literature. The article doesn't give any objective or useful perspective of the subject matter, the article should be removed or rewritten.M4bwav (talk) 18:55, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
Good concise description of CSLA. We've been successfully using CSLA (it is open source and free) as the middleware for our WPF applications for years. The article could be improved by describing more thoroughly how CSLA can be deployed through a data portal (or not).Greggdourgarian (talk) 10:43, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
The descriptions are very poor for a newcomer to understand although exciting. Yeah appears like an advertisement but can be corrected to make it more insighful into solution that CSLA provides. Venkyzealous