Jump to content

Talk:1292 Advanced Programmable Video System

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Makhram (talk | contribs) at 02:23, 6 April 2012. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
WikiProject iconVideo games Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Pretty good

This console is pretty good for it's time, with it's 8 bit proccesor going against 4 bit consoles like the Fairchild CF and the 2600, just what I think. mcjakeqcool Mcjakeqcool (talk) 12:10, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What are you talking about? The Fairchild and 2600 are 8bit. --Marty Goldberg (talk) 18:07, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No accualty, the Atari 5200 and 7800 are 8 bit and the 2600 was 4 bit, the Fairchild Channel F never recieved a follow up but it was indeed 4 bit. mcjakeqcool Mcjakeqcool (talk) 17:40, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
What on Earth are you talking about? The Fairchild F8 used in the Fairchild Channel F was an 8-bit CPU, as was the MOS Technology 6507 used in the Atari 2600. If you want to find a 4-bit system from the era, you'd have to look for something based around an Intel 4004 or a TMS1000, such as the many handheld games and toys of the era. --Mr z (talk) 18:20, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Update

Updates Links (was Out-dated) Telanus (talk) 14:48, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 04:48, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]