Talk:UPC and NPC

Re: too technical for most readers to understand

I've tried to improve the article a bit; however, if you look at the pages that reference this one, e.g. Traffic policing, Leaky bucket, and GCRA, these are all of a highly technical nature. Hence, the probability of a non-technical reader stumbling onto this page by accident must be fairly small. Assuming, therefore that most readers that are actually likely to try to understand this page have some technical bent, or they'd have given up long before getting here, then a Janet and John approach is probably going to be more off-putting, in terms of the number of readers so off-put, than an overtly technical one. As a result, I would council against too much effort to make it intelligible to all readers.Graham.Fountain | Talk 10:05, 2 April 2012 (UTC)