Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Java Barn

Java Barn

Java Barn (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

1. No indic. of notability 2. no indep refs 3. quick look for refs only found depend. refs Widefox (talk) 08:48, 28 March 2012 (UTC)

• Comment. Wouldn't articles from St. Lawrence University be considered reliable? Because there are many... That said, it is already talked about in the University's article, so a redirect may not be a bad idea. ~dee^(talk?) 15:21, 28 March 2012 (UTC)

Do you mean articles about St. Lawrence University or articles authored by St. Lawrence University (staff/students/grads) ? Notability is what I mean, neither influence that. If you are in favour of a redirect, would an agree-merge fit? Widefox (talk) 21:14, 28 March 2012 (UTC)

Yes. A merge with relevant and referenced content would be best + a redirect. ~dee^(talk?) 13:08, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:56, 28 March 2012 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:56, 28 March 2012 (UTC)

• Merge and redirect to St. Lawrence University per my comments above. ~dee^(talk?) 14:49, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
• Merge to St. Lawrence University -- Whpq (talk) 16:32, 29 March 2012 (UTC)