Talk:Crime Classification Manual

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Psychology

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Books Stub‑class

	Books portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Law Enforcement Stub‑class

	Law portal This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Law Enforcement. Please Join, Create, and Assess.Law EnforcementWikipedia:WikiProject Law EnforcementTemplate:WikiProject Law EnforcementLaw enforcement
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Crime and Criminal Biography Stub‑class Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

nonencyclopedic content

I have removed what I consider to be nonencyclopedic content. A link to individual articles on individual crimes is not appropriate--this is not an article about the classification of crimes, but about this particular book. DGG (talk) 19:24, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 13:34, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability

Why is this article notable? Cusop Dingle (talk) 21:08, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is a US FBI standard issue reference manual. Npmay (talk) 21:13, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Then there should be a citation to a reliable source saying so. Cusop Dingle (talk) 21:17, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Have you looked for one? Npmay (talk) 21:33, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The burden of proof would be on the person making this assertion. Cusop Dingle (talk) 21:42, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If it was an assertion made in the article. This is an encyclopedia, not a court of law. About 2,030 results for "FBI's standard-issue Crime Classification Manual" verbatim feel free to look through those or not. Please do not contact me on my talk page again. Thank you and good day! Npmay (talk) 22:12, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Number of citations

I have removed a claim of the number of citations of this book, which was sourced to a Google Scholar search. Google Scholar is a search engine, not a reliable source and even if the citations were counted and checked this would still only constitute original research. Cusop Dingle (talk) 21:45, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You are mistaken, Google Scholar is a reliable secondary source for such information. I intend to replace the deleted statement and citation, and ask that you take the matter up with WP:RSN, leaving me out of it. Thank you and good day. Npmay (talk) 22:01, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]