Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Intel processor confusion (second nom)

Intel processor confusion

There are multiple reasons this page should be deleted. For one, the title is horribly, horribly POV. For another, this information is redundant; it's all present in a variety of other articles (List of Intel microprocessors, List of Intel Pentium 4 microprocessors, List of Intel Pentium D microprocessors, and List of Intel Core microprocessors, as well as the individual processor pages come to mind). It also violates WP:NOT, as this is a classic example of "an indiscriminate collection of information". Processors are added for the sole reason that the article's original creator finds them "confusing". Entire product lines are skipped solely because of an author's POV. Jgp 01:04, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. I'm confused here- am I right in thinking this article is being re-nominated for deletion 3 weeks after it survived a previous AfD, and if so, why? Badgerpatrol 02:20, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Superman-strong Keep, since no response to the above question, regardless of article content. It borders on bad-faith to renominate an article so quickly, simply to try and reverse an unwanted result. Deleting an article under these circumstances sets a bad precedent- should not be renominated unless there have been significant deleterious changes to the content or context in the interim since the last save. In this case, there have been none at all. Badgerpatrol 12:48, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep but rename "confusion" to 'statistics', it may be useful to see the data in a table like this rather than how its set out like a list at the other articles. The missing product lines should be added -- Astrokey44|talk 05:08, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to relevant Pentium microprocessors lists--TBC^{??? ??? ???} 05:36, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. In the last AfD discussion, many suggested it be merged to List of Intel microprocessors, but that will not happen, as there is no proper way of dumping this mess into that page without ruining that one as well. This article has long been abandoned by its sole contributer, and it will stay the unmaintained mess it is. --Ezeu 07:07, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per TBC. SorryGuy 07:19, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to the relevant x86 microprocessor lists - and then delete, as there won't be anything left on this page that's not in those lists. (Note that the "lists" on those pages are tables, so "it may be useful to see the data in a table like this rather than how its set out like a list at the other articles" doesn't apply. The missing product lines should have list pages of their own, just as is done with the AMD microprocessors. This stuff might not merge well into List of Intel microprocessors, but it would merge better into List of Intel Pentium 4 microprocessors, List of Intel Pentium D microprocessors, and List of Intel Core microprocessors.)

At least one reason for re-proposing this is that User:Jgp has created pages for lists of particular families of x86 microprocessors, so merging into those pages is a new option - and, I suspect, what Jgp has in mind. Guy Harris 07:25, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In fact, I think he's now finished merging all the stuff from this page into those lists, so the Merge part is already done, and this page is redundant. Guy Harris 23:14, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merge per TBC Computerjoe 's talk 10:13, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I see nothing here which is not better covered already. POV title certainly does not help. Just zis Guy you know? 11:17, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per TBC. --Ter e nc e Ong 11:25, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Rename or Merge, title is horribly POV. Some okay information though. Lankiveil 12:53, 12 April 2006 (UTC).[reply]
Merge. I admit I'm unimpressed with the argument that this ought not be renominated within three weeks, given that individual articles can be edited or reverted within three minutes if editors feel it necessary to do so. WP:NOT#Wikipedia_is_not_an_indiscriminate_collection_of_information. RGTraynor 15:34, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Jgp's new articles, then delete. per all the other merges. Qleem 16:36, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge then Delete as per above. Just another star in the night ^{T | @ | C} 20:39, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per TBC --Mason 22:41, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]