Jump to content

Talk:Programming and Metaprogramming in the Human Biocomputer

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Mitch Ames (talk | contribs) at 09:19, 2 March 2012 (Mitch Ames moved page Talk:Human Biocomputer to Talk:Human biocomputer: standard capitalisation). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

I am unsure of how to categorize this page, for the reason that i believe it to be heuristic, yet neuroheuristic more over, and there really is no category for this. I may have to create one later. I have also left things unfinished, such as footnotes or notation. I don't know how to do that yet, and will learn shortly. Wiki help pages said I can just toss the info on, and someone will come and fix it. As long as pages numbers and where i got it from are noted.

Zos 19:05, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]


not bad but umm, i dont think its appropriate to put this in neuroscience at all (pseudoscience if anything.) Is there a category for cognitive development? evolutionary psychology? new age/occult books? Also wouldn't this fall under the grounds of semiotics? And no, I haven't even read the book.

Oh also, theres a bit of a super geeky pun on the front page, "help improve the human biocomputer by expanding it"! (I love it!) Universal Logic (talk) 07:16, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]