Jump to content

Template:Arbitration case implementation notes

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Arcticocean (talk | contribs) at 17:15, 26 February 2012 (added shortcut, changed yellow to ivory-yellow per talk (and to harmonise with Casenav), noted shortcuts). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Clerks and Arbitrators should use this section to clarify their understanding of the final decision—at a minimum, a list of items that have passed. Additionally, a list of which remedies are conditional on others (for instance a ban that should only be implemented if a mentorship should fail), and so on. Arbitrators should not pass the motion to close the case until they are satisfied with the implementation notes.

These notes were last updated by 17:15, 26 February 2012 (UTC); the last edit to this page was on 17:15, 26 February 2012 (UTC) by User:Arcticocean.

Proposed Principles
Number Proposal Name Support Oppose Abstain Status Awaiting Support needed Notes
None currently
Proposed Findings of Fact
Number Proposal Name Support Oppose Abstain Status Awaiting Support needed Notes
None currently
Proposed Remedies
Number Proposal Name Support Oppose Abstain Status Awaiting Support needed Notes
None currently
Proposed Enforcement Provisions
Number Proposal Name Support Oppose Abstain Status No-votes Support needed Notes
None currently
Notes


Usage

{{ACI
|updated     = ~~~~ (replace after each update)
|principles  = \
|findings    =  \___\ For each of these, provide one /P (ie /Proposal) template per proposal in this section.
|remedies    =  /   / Place each template on a separate line. See that template's page for further documentation.
|enforcement = /
}}