Talk:Open problem
On 2005/9/11 this was seen in the article:
'Unfortunately, these problems were solved by faculty members, not by graduate students.'
Implying what? Faculty shouldn't have to do any work :)? Or is the intent to say that no graduate students were harmed/involved (in reference to common expression "no animals were harmed in the production of XYZ") in the solution?
http://laplace.compbio.ucsf.edu/~jchodera/pubs/pdf/protein-folding-problem.pdf << this Link is not working — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.176.67.163 (talk) 06:49, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
2007-02-8 Automated pywikipediabot message
 | This page has been transwikied to Wiktionary. The article has content that is useful at Wiktionary. Therefore the article can be found at either here or here (logs 1 logs 2.) Note: This means that the article has been copied to the Wiktionary Transwiki namespace for evaluation and formatting. It does not mean that the article is in the Wiktionary main namespace, or that it has been removed from Wikipedia's. Furthermore, the Wiktionarians might delete the article from Wiktionary if they do not find it to be appropriate for the Wiktionary. Removing this tag will usually trigger CopyToWiktionaryBot to re-transwiki the entry. This article should have been removed from Category:Copy to Wiktionary and should not be re-added there. |
--CopyToWiktionaryBot 10:13, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
Philosophy
Apart from science and maths, is philosophy considered to study open problems too? --Aeternus (talk) 12:41, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
- Aren't all philosophical questions open problems? :) Tim Vickers (talk) 20:40, 12 October 2009 (UTC)