SAS Institute lawsuit with World Programming
![]() | This article needs to be divided into sections. (July 2011) |
This article may have been previously nominated for deletion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SAS Institute lawsuit with World Programming exists. It is proposed that this article be deleted because of the following concern:
If you can address this concern by improving, copyediting, sourcing, renaming, or merging the page, please edit this page and do so. You may remove this message if you improve the article or otherwise object to deletion for any reason. Although not required, you are encouraged to explain why you object to the deletion, either in your edit summary or on the talk page. If this template is removed, do not replace it. This message has remained in place for seven days, so the article may be deleted without further notice. Find sources: "SAS Institute lawsuit with World Programming" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR Nominator: Please consider notifying the author/project: {{subst:proposed deletion notify|SAS Institute lawsuit with World Programming|concern=Overly specific title, no sources, dubious notability. Most lawsuits do not warrant articles}} ~~~~ Timestamp: 20120210203209 20:32, 10 February 2012 (UTC) Administrators: delete |
The SAS Institute, creators of SAS System filed a lawsuit against World Programming Limited, creators of World Programming System or WPS. The dispute was whether World Programming had infringed copyrights on SAS Institute Products, and Manuals and whether World Programming used SAS Learning Edition to reverse engineer SAS system in violation with its term of usage.
The High Court of England and Wales made the following observations:
- SAS can be considered a general programming language, though it serves largely as a database programming language and a language with a wide variety of specialized analytic and graphic procedures
- First, it confirms what WPL has always admitted, namely that it has used the SAS Manuals to emulate functionality of the SAS System in WPS. Secondly, it shows that to some extent WPL has reproduced aspects of the SAS Manuals going beyond that which was strictly necessary in order for WPS to emulate the functions of the SAS System. What it does not show is reproduction of the SAS source code by WPS going beyond the reproduction of its functionality.
- WPL's manual writers did not copy directly from the SAS Manuals in the sense of having one of the SAS Manuals open in front of them when writing the WPS Manual and intentionally either transcribing or paraphrasing the wording. A considerable degree of similarity in both content and language between the SAS Manual entries and the WPS Manual entries is to be expected given that they are describing identical functionality. The degree of resemblance in the language goes beyond that which is attributable to describing identical functionality.
External links
This redirect needs additional or more specific categories. (July 2011) |