Jump to content

Talk:Uniform memory access

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by VanishedUserABC (talk | contribs) at 16:27, 4 February 2012 (moved Talk:Uniform Memory Access to Talk:Uniform memory access: lowercase). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
WikiProject iconComputing Stub‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Note icon
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.

Removed note about caching... All processors have cache, if there is a discussion about cache coherency or uniform address space, that needs to be addressed in a less confusing manor. It makes it seem as if UMA has caching and NUMA does not.

Yeah, but now the article suggests that in UMA all the memory, including CPU caches, is uniformly shared. I think the previous editor attempted to clarify this issue. --Kubanczyk (talk) 10:09, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, but when someone says memory, do you think of the L2 cache on the processor, when is that not exclusive to the processor across a network? sorry you are going to have to prove your case better than that. wikipediapwned. --69.150.57.124 (talk) 03:25, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]