Talk:Conway's base 13 function

Mathematics Stub‑class Low‑priority

	Mathematics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-priority on the project's priority scale.

13

Is the exact number 13 important? Or could this have been done with 14, 17, 23? Crasshopper (talk) 16:10, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The only importance of base 13 is that this particular encoding of real numbers uses 13 symbols. If you used an encoding with two symbols then it would be a base 2 function. David Radcliffe (talk) 04:39, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reference

Needs a better reference (94.212.42.237 (talk) 19:21, 5 October 2011 (UTC)).[reply]

Digits

It is more conventional, and would be less confusing, to use the digits 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.162.130.215 (talk) 15:07, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, and I've changed the article to match this. 128.86.179.86 (talk) 17:37, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Error correction

"Indeed, $f$ takes on the value of every real number on any closed interval $[a,b]$ where $b>a$ ." This is false. For example, if $a=.++$ (base 13) and $b=.+++$ , then $f$ is constantly 0 on $[a,b]$ .

I edited the page accordingly, but am still not sure if the article %100 correct.

Quinn (talk) 03:34, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

(In the new notation, this example reads a=0.ACC, b=0.ACCC.)

The article was correct before, so I changed it back. I think you missed the fact that the expansion only has to end in the required form; I've now highlighted that in the definition. For example, the interval you've given includes 0.ACC0 up to 0.ACC1, so you can encode any decimal in this region e.g. f(0.AAC0B123A456...)=123.456.... Let me know if you want more details (I haven't completely figured out the algorithm for picking the analogue to 0.ACC0 for arbitrary a and b, but I don't think it's too hard). 128.86.179.86 (talk) 18:02, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]