Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ZipcodeZoo
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by SporkBot (talk | contribs) at 20:33, 21 January 2012 (Replace template per TFD outcome; no change in content). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.Revision as of 20:33, 21 January 2012 by SporkBot (talk | contribs) (Replace template per TFD outcome; no change in content)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Shimeru 07:07, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- ZipcodeZoo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I can't find significant coverage for this website. Joe Chill (talk) 14:02, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: The article under discussion here has been {{rescue}} flagged by an editor for review by the Article Rescue Squadron.
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- Joe Chill (talk) 14:08, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 00:13, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply] - Keep. One of the news hits said that the website crashed shortly after opening. Seems notable.-- φ OnePt618Talk φ 04:14, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I want to amend my erroneous statement above -- the news article was actually referring to another site. I still feel this is notable enough to keep around.-- φ OnePt618Talk φ 04:23, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Do you have any guideline based reason for this keep? Joe Chill (talk) 06:04, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I want to amend my erroneous statement above -- the news article was actually referring to another site. I still feel this is notable enough to keep around.-- φ OnePt618Talk φ 04:23, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This article has been nominated for rescue. -- φ OnePt618Talk φ 04:14, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - as per nom. Codf1977 (talk) 11:34, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - All of the sources in the article are primary. SnottyWong talk 23:35, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep 5 results from Google news search, 14 from Google book search, and 85 from Google scholar. The news articles mostly require you pay to read them, so I can't see exactly what's there. This stands out though. "ZipcodeZoo offers descriptions of over 3 million species of plants and animals, with 250,000 photos, maps, pronunciations, and definitions in 13 languages." Sounds notable to me. That's the largest collection of species I find mentioned anywhere. Dream Focus 05:27, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete having reviewed this article due to the current ANI thread about Jclemens, I have to agree with nom and Snottywong that there is a lack of WP:RS here establishing notability. Verbal chat 08:02, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:RS and WP:GHITS. There is a distinct lack of significant coverage in independent reliable sources. Location (talk) 20:15, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.