Jump to content

Talk:Artificial Linguistic Internet Computer Entity

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Mr. Stradivarius (talk | contribs) at 12:14, 21 January 2012 (Rating for the Applied Lingusitics Task Force). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
WikiProject iconLinguistics: Applied Linguistics Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by Applied Linguistics Task Force.

The Conversation of ALICE with ALICE is no longer active on that link.

IS small Brother

I was just chatting with ALICE, and somehow she got the impression my name was IS small Brother (we were discussing 1984). Anyway, I log out, log back in, and ask her who IS small Brother is. She responded "Charlie Parker." Ŏ_O --Ye Olde Luke (talk) 07:29, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Turing test?

Is it really accurate to say ALICE can't pass a Turing test? It's fooled some people, and others not -- Turing never specified that it be 100% successful, nor that the human interrogator needed to know a lot about computers. I think ALICE *does* pass the Turing test (at least according to the initial definitions) and this shows the flaws in the idea as a test of real intelligence. If you look at something like the Loebner Prize, almost all the judges are going to be of well above-average intelligence (there's a strong self-selection effect, because high intelligence is highly correlated with being interested in AI in the first place.) To pass a Turing test, does it have to fool a highly intelligent 'computer nerd', or will fooling an average person suffice? Can we have a source saying it can't pass one? Vultur (talk) 23:10, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It really can't. I was a judge in 2000 - and my essay on it is linked in the article, ALICE Springs - of course their are limits to the test, and the set up is artificial, but no one could mistake that for human. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fiskeharrison (talkcontribs) 00:04, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
OK, then, sure. Thanks. Vultur (talk) 11:58, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]