Talk:Technology forecasting

Futures studies Start‑class Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Futures studies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Futures studies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Futures studiesWikipedia:WikiProject Futures studiesTemplate:WikiProject Futures studiesfutures studies
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Tone and references

This article currently reads like a personal essay and features no references, both seemingly in violation of Wikipedia's no original research policy. For example, a Google search for "projection to absurdity" — a recently added link — returned no results. jareha 18:03, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

personal or not tone is apropriate for me, this article is good overview on subject, but needs more references. I have changed template to Unreferenced —The preceding unsigned comment was added by AndriuZ (talk • contribs) .

the "alternatives" section seems rather biased. it should either be cut or revised. 83.94.140.83 23:50, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This topic is a subtpoic of Management of Technology. There should be a WP entry for MoT.MetaAnalyst 11:36, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion..

Might we right or left the TOC and columnize the see also? Emesee (talk) 08:20, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]