Jump to content

Talk:Comparison of cryptographic hash functions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 91.206.174.166 (talk) at 10:25, 12 January 2012 (Added a comment regarding RIPEMD vs RIPEMD-160.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

I'm curious if there is some way to either split a few pages or some method to keep pages with the same content up to date. For instance there is at least: Cryptographic_hash_function Comparison_of_cryptographic_hash_functions Hash_function_security_summary

They aren't always all in sync with each other and that's not to mention the pages for each hash function. Thoughts? Quelrod (talk) 18:24, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It would be very interesting if someone would take the time to gather license/patent information about the algorithms :) -LM

Putting attack on the complete algorithm and attack on reduced rounds versions in the same table is completely unreadable, mixing practical weaknesses and irrelevant to practical security ones...


From a causality point of view - RIPEMD can not be derived from RIPEMD-160, since the latter was in fact developed after the first.