Talk:Extended Access Control

Move?

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved by User:Vianello based on this discussion. Dpmuk (talk) 20:56, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Extended access control → Extended Access Control —

Looks like a proper name. Pnm (talk) 02:27, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
But is it a proper name? Anthony Appleyard (talk) 07:32, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm assuming so, from usage in a majority of (though not all) sources in this search and article's sole reference and for consistency with Basic Access Control. Any evidence it's not? --Pnm (talk) 03:16, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support: Certainly does look like a proper name and for consistency with Basic Access Control per Pnm. –CWenger (talk) 18:22, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Technical Details of EAC

I added a few details of how the CVCA chain works. I'm not sure how much detail should be there, but the article is pretty sparse. This is my first edit. Uberfluffy (talk) 15:17, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]