Jump to content

Talk:Practical Common Lisp

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 87.252.227.61 (talk) at 11:41, 31 December 2011. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
WikiProject iconComputing Stub‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconBooks Stub‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

I am not an authority on Lisp and my "review" of this excellent book was really an essay on general programming topics, not a book review. Therefore, the link to "Practical Common Lisp" at www.developerdotstar.com is misleading, and I have removed it. - Edward G. Nilges

1. Why this book is good introduction to Lisp programming language? - not any other? 2. How did it affect on something? 3. Criticism 4. Which parts of the ANSI Common Lisp standard this book doesn't describe? 5. Any recommendations of famous in programming world people? Institutes? Etc. 6. History Sorry for my English.