Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FOLDOP
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Retired username (talk | contribs) at 23:57, 1 April 2006 (Closing debate; result was delete). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.Revision as of 23:57, 1 April 2006 by Retired username (talk | contribs) (Closing debate; result was delete)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete this but Free On-line Dictionary of Philosophy remains. W.marsh 23:57, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Basically a link farm and advertising for a dictionary. Kilo-Lima|(talk) 15:09, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Question: But what about WP:WEB, Kilo-Lima? Does is pass? - the.crazy.russian (T) (C) (E) 20:08, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Overall Alexa rank for www.swif.it, the parent website where this is located, is #2,520,866. Fan1967 20:32, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per nom. doesn't appear to come close to WP:WEB. Alexa rank can be deceptive - if we use that as a criteria then all manner spam sites would be listed... Bridesmill 23:12, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Do not delete it, please it is a stub for a better entry. FOLDOP is the philosophical version of FOLDOC (which is obviously ok), on which it was originally based. Just give enough time to the FOLDOP guys to come up with a better definition. I've already told them to write it following the FOLDOP entry. Floridi 16:52, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Does not pass WP:WEB. The articles of Luciano Floridi, SWIF, IACAP (same author), all the articles of FloridiContrib smell of self promotion. No other contributors found. MaNeMeBasat 06:43, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Apologies, Marcello Di Bello made me realize that the entry is already available at Free On-line Dictionary of Philosophy. Shall we transform this into a signpost? PS A quick consideration: smells can be deceiving 8) cheers Floridi 16:22, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.