Talk:Content and language integrated learning

Linguistics: Applied Linguistics Unassessed

	Linguistics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Applied Linguistics Task Force.

This is only a start. I hope to add more later. I'd like to make a re-direct from CLIL but the page seems to be blocked. Can anyone help to get it unblocked? Chris.let (talk) 05:33, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's now been done. Kdammers (talk) 13:46, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Is there any reason this information can't be located at Content-based instruction until it is developed enough for its own article? SnottyWong ^spout 21:27, 1 July 2010 (UTC) [reply]

As CLIL is such a big thing in Europe and the term CBI is little used there I think that this article needs to stay, but be expanded to reflect the content in the other language CLIL wikipedia articles (even if you don't speak them, take a look at the Italian and Spanish pages and you'll see that they are quite comprehensive. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.78.5.158 (talk) 15:07, 8 July 2010 (UTC) [reply]

Merging CLIL with Language immersion

CLIL is fundamentally a part of the Language immersion's strategies that gathers the majority of the studies and researches of the sector. Furthermore only this latter article seems to really collect a vaste international bibliography. I propose to move "CLIL" inside of Language immersion's article.--Cornelius383 (talk) 16:26, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Of course in this case we have to accurately revise the "Language immersion"'article 'cause I think there are something to modify...--Cornelius383 (talk) 16:30, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]