This is an archive of past discussions with User:Keyan20. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
2000's onwards, several young actors made their foray into lead actor roles, changing the box office presence patttern.
Hello.please stop further destroying the article. Since you dont like it, you cant destroy it as you are doing now. It is very clear that you are totally against its significance and vandalizing it keeping personal interests & hatred. And you cannot instruct any user to which page they should edit or not. Being a proper wikipedian all have their own right to edit free and fair. Myself or anyone are not restricting or controlling you to edit any pages. If you would like to contribute to Telugu cinema articles, do it & for that matter you can't destroy others becoz of your personal dislikes and hatred. This is totally unacceptable. First shifting from various IP's register yourself first legally. Your full activity clearly shows to want to edit in destroying the articles which you dont like or interested. Stop it, further more will make you blocked completely to edit wiki. ---- Ungal Vettu Pillai (talk) 23:37, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
please stop your excessive POV
A statement like this is called POV - Tamil cinema produces most popular films in India
Half of Tamil cinema article is filled with statements like this
The reversions are made by BOT and it is asking me to report false positive
I am not a vandal. I am removing excessive POV and promotional material to Nuetral point
I reverted ur edits back to edits made by Active Banana
I am not shifting from any IP addresses - all my Ips start with 61.2
This is a dial up connection, this happens with a Dial up internet connection when ever u connect after disconnecting
it is not in my hands. I am the same person who is messaging u
(61.2.73.148 (talk) 05:53, 30 May 2011 (UTC)).
I am asking ur help to add the info I gave about Telugu cinema because -
the article is semi protected( because if the high quality of wording and clear information in that particular article) and only auto confirmed users are allowed to edit
Tamil cinema clearly has two TAGS ABOUT AUDITING AND REFERENCES - it needs auditing - because it has lot of excessive un related information
ADMINSITRATORS CAN easily make out who is a vandal 0 if u just say stop vandalising - administrator is not a fool that he cant make out who is vandalising
my reversion are justified by editors- automatic BOT reversion has only to do with size of the article
may be ur new to wikipedia - please talk to some one who is old to wikipedia
I am asking ur help here in improving both tamil and telugu articles
example: information about film making, song and dance sequences, Business models, film genres are not into
And i have removed it again. It is the WP:BURDEN of the person adding or returning content to provide appropriate sourcing within the article in question. Something being "well understood" is not sufficient, particularly when you are making claims about censorship. ActiveBanana(bananaphone12:15, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
WP:BURDEN of person adding or restoring content to provide appropriate sourcing
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Cinema of India. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively.
Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.note that 3rr is not an entitlement, if you continue to edit war against multiple editors, you will be blocked —SpacemanSpiff20:16, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
IR template
It's inappropriate to have such templates, since he has composed thousands of songs for hundreds of films. What makes the listed ones alone "notable". There are hundreds of notable compositions. It's good to avoid such redundant templates. --Commander(Ping Me)07:39, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Tamil Nadu 2011 Election
Thx for your input on the infobox on this page. I feel like in the infobox, it is appropriate and looks good if there is only one image. The flag was put up because there were no free images of the two candidates. If the images you put up is free and meet the fair use standards, I feel like putting only the picture rather than the flag would be better and more appropriate.--Nader85021 (talk) 03:56, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
Re Mani Ratnam
I did not remove any image. I just swapped both. Since the image of him at "Raavan premiere" is more related with the film I moved that to the appropriate section. Moreover you should stop adding Peacock terms. --Commander(Ping Me)11:54, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
== [File:TamilActorVijayimage.JPG] == : This image is taken by me and created by me .. So I'm the copy right holder , I know not how to include this details please guideThe wind or breeze 17:29, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
Vidya Balan - last warning
Please stop edit warring on the Vidya Balan article. You are ignoring a well-accepted note, and facts also. Please see the talk page and if you feel it's not right, then discuss. In addition, the article was updated. If you continue edit warring, you will be blocked from editing. Shahid • Talk2me08:47, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Tamil cinema, you may be blocked from editing. Active Banana (bananaphone 22:12, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
